Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

Open Conversation Tonight

  • Broadcast in Politics
Perry Steele

Perry Steele

×  

Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow Perry Steele.
h:81712
s:5380715
archived
 

 

 

 

 

“While we understand that as Commander in Chief you have a constitutional obligation to protect our national interests from direct attack, Congress has the constitutional obligation and power to approve military force, even if the United States or its direct interests (such as its embassies) have not been attacked or threatened with an attack,” the 54 Members of Congress wrote in the letter. “As such, we strongly urge you to seek an affirmative decision of Congress prior to committing any U.S. military engagement to this complex crisis.”

The letter continues: “While the ongoing human rights violations and continued loss of life are horrific, they should not draw us into an unwise war—especially without adhering to our own constitutional requirements. We strongly support the work within the United Nations Security Council to build international consensus condemning the alleged use of chemical weapons and preparing an appropriate response.

 

 

Facebook comments

Available when logged-in to Facebook and if Targeting Cookies are enabled