Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

Confronting False Legal Presumptions

  • Broadcast in Finance
THE NEIL GARFIELD SHOW

THE NEIL GARFIELD SHOW

×  

Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow THE NEIL GARFIELD SHOW.
h:540179
s:11032311
archived

Tonight we talk about how to deal with legal presumptions and how much proof you need to undermine the presumptions and thus force the foreclosing party (if it exists at all) to prove its case with real evidence, testimony and documents that are valid and authenticated.

Based upon 12 years of experience with this issue I have concluded with complete certainty that the named foreclosers are pretenders and that they have no right, title or interest in the loans. More importantly I have concluded that the lawyers for the named foreclosers do not have witnesses nor documents that can be corroborated or authenticated.

This leaves ownership of the debt in the winds. The fact that the court is not given the information necessary to conclude that the party who initiated foreclosure is not the creditor and that as far as the case is concerned, no creditor stepped forward is not a problem for homeowners. It is a problem for the banks who want the courts to grant foreclosure to whoever claims it.

Facebook comments

Available when logged-in to Facebook and if Targeting Cookies are enabled