Email us for help
Loading...
Premium support
Log Out
Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.
"CAN FEMALE JURORS BE IMPARTIAL TO MEN ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ASSAULT BY MULTIPLE WOMEN AFTER THE ALLEGATIONS HAVE BEEN HIGHLY PUBLICIZED?"
Right now we're seeing this with Harvey Weinstein; previously we saw it with Bill Cosby. When multiple women come forward publicly accusing men of sexual assault-- especially celebrity accuser or accused-- does that make it almost impossible to find an #impartial jury? Does it become even harder if the number of accusers continously increases and are women? Can a man get a fair trial? Would women jurors automatically believe that a multitude of women accusers unequivocally means that a male defendant is guilty? The 6th Amendment of our Constitution guarantees the right to a public trial by an impartial jury. But when the public convicts a person before a Trial occurs, perpetually sharing allegations on Social Media across the globe in the twinkling of an eye even if the allegations are notyet substantiated, can the accused's right to an impartial Jury be protected? We want to hear from YOU! Call In (323-870-4180) or Tune In Online to give your Answer On Air and Deliberate with other Listeners ("Jurors) to reach a verdict LIVE!
Hosted by Attorney Rawsi Williams of Rawsi Williams Law Group, learn more at CallRawsiWilliams.com