SORT BY Relevancy
Judge Mark Davis is currently sitting on the second highest court of North Carolina. Having been appointed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals by Governor Perdue, Judge Davis is looking to keep his seat for a full term.
Mark Davis is part of a group that calls themselves Fair Judges for North Carolina. Though Judge Davis cannot delve into any issues that could come before him at the North Carolina Court of Appeals, we are eager to hear what he has to say about the court and how it affects our daily lives.
Let's get the conversation going...
We're going to have Melissa from Iowa. She'll be telling us her tale of woe, and we will be discussing the dirty tactics employed in court hearings and appeals.
Join us at 2 p.m. Central today!!
Welcome to the SC&H Group podcast series. Jeremy Chitlik of SC&H Group will shed light on some important issues surrounding Washington’ DCs real estate tax assessment and appeals process. As some of our listeners may know, Jeremy is a Senior Manager in SC&H’s real property practice, and before joining SC&H, was the supervisor of major commercial properties in DC’s office of tax and revenue.
The Lightening Girls discuss Nascar inspections and appeals. Have you wondered how this process works?
We would also like to invite you to call in, or join us in the chat room. Here is the question of the night;
If you are a suspended crew chief, the rules state that you must turn over your radio and cell phone - do you think that the team can handle the pressure of not being able to communicate with you for the term of the suspension? What are your thoughts and opinions?
BIA’s position on the INA 212 Waiver for lawful permanent residents
In a recent decision, Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I & N Dec. 563 (BIA 2015), the Board of Immigration Appeals held, An alien who adjusted status in the United States, and who has not entered as a lawful permanent resident, is not barred from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (2012), as a result of an aggravated felony conviction. Matter of E.W. Rodriguez, 25 I&N Dec. 784 (BIA 2012), and Matter of Koljenovic, 25 I&N Dec. 219 (BIA 2010), withdrawn.
When Congress amended the immigration laws a few years ago, it disallowed green card holder the ability to cancel deportation if that person committed an aggravated felony. For a number of years now, the various federal circuit courts of appeals struggled with the issue of whether a person who adjusted status in the US is still eligible for a discretionary waiver after committing an aggravated felony. Most circuits (2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 7th, 9th, 10, & 11th). The 8th circuit said no, Roberts v. Holder. The 1st circuit has not decided that issue. The BIA in a minor holding said that since most circuits (9 out of 11 said yes it have to create uniformity through the country. If you consular processed for your green card, no waiver is available for an aggravated felony.
Marcus Jarvis, Immigration & Criminal attorney. www.m-jlawltd.com
Book: “A Simple Guide to the Immigration Laws of the United States: What you NEED to know when you come to America.” www.a-tbooks.com and www.amazon.com
DACA that was granted on June 15, 2012 is still available. Extended DACA that should have become available on 02/18/2015 has been held up by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, and DAPA that should have become available as of 05/20/2015 has been held up by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
DACA of 2012 is still available. If one is in removal proceedings, and of an age younger than 31 on 06/15/2012, in school, or completed high school, have no felony or multiple misdemenor, you entered the USA before age 16, you entered before 06/15/2007, you may qualify for DACA of 2012.
If you have met the above requirements except that you are not yet age 15 and not in removal proceeding, you have to wait until age 15 to apply for the 2012 DACA.
Marcus Jarvis Attorney www.m-jlawltd.com
1-(763) 425 5447
Book: "A Simple Guide to the Immigration Laws of the United States: What you NEED to know when you come to America." www.a-tbooks.com
Which appeals to you more.... the idea of what's holding you back or saying what's my next step in my evolution?
Does it make a difference how we speak to ourselves and others? Are words really THAT important?
When you "pray" how are you praying? Does the manner in which you present prayer make a difference? What exactly are you asking for...petitioning for....showing gratitude for?
We want your input...your ideas....your questions about this topic of prayer and manifestation in your life. Please promise yourself to call in and express yourself. BE part of this episode.
Munishwarji and Joyce Stech (Master JAH) will be in Atlanta, Georgia, June 6th, 2015 at the Spiritual Living Center of Atlanta, 1730 NE Expressway NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 to expound upon this theory from 10am-6pm. Register at TempleOfTheInnerSelf.org
$250 $195 by May 27, 2015 enter promo code BLOGTALK and receive an additional $10 savings.
Dr. Chaps reports on these important issues:
* An appeals court rules that the NSA cannot collect your secret phone data.
* Secretary of Defense denies that he’s planning to take over Texas
* The Pentagon is accused of hiding reports about sex crimes.
Josh Duggar, son of Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar from the popular reality show “19 Kids and Counting”, is in the midst of a media firestorm, resulting from several allegations of molestation against at least five younger girls in the early 2000s. These events occurred when the eldest son of the Duggar clan was 14. Reruns of the show were immediately pulled, however TLC is still deciding on the future of the program. When the patriarch finally went to the police to report the incidents, the report was given to a trooper, who subsequently refused to investigate. As a result, the statute of limitations ran out, making any prosecution against Josh impossible. The trooper himself has since been found guilty of charges related to child ography. Instead, the Duggars chose to have Josh take part in manual labor and counseling with an unlicensed Christian counselor. Jim Bob claims in the police report that he believed that the counseling program was affiliated with the police department. Since this story broke, high-profile right wing religious leaders have come to the defense of Josh and his parents, using language such as “regrettable” and “mistakes”, accusing the media of “sensationalizing” the story, making appeals to Jesus, and claiming that these incidents occurred before Josh was a Christian. Should Jim Bob and Michelle be held accountable for knowingly waiting a year before reporting the incidents to authorities? Did Josh do enough to make restitution for his crimes? What role, if any, did Christian privilege play into how this case was handled by the authorities?
Call in number is 347-202-0492
Navajo Internet Radio - Tonight's Guest: Mr. Richie Nez, Navajo Nation Office of Hearings and Appeals:
The biggest topic of the Navajo Nation Election season, why the primary election grievances were dismissed, we will have the Hearing Officer Mr. Nez as a guest to explain the reasons of dismissal.
There were several grievances filed against candidate Chris Deschene, but we will find out which grievance period is valid and are there specific grievances applicable to each grievance period?
Call in and ask your questions. Share your opinions.
Sports Illustrated legal anaylst Michael McCann and former NFL linebacker & NFLPA representative Ben Leber join Matt Chatham to dive into the details of the NFL appeals process, as well as any additional legal avenues available to Tom Brady and his legal team. Excellent NFLPA insight from Ben shedding light on how players got to the uncomfortable place they're in now regarding disputes with the league, as well as terrific info from Michael on the probable legal tactics for Brady in his attempt to exonerate himself and turn the focus on a league that forgot what "integrity" means.
METAPHYSICS OF MANIPULATION PART 3
Ethos: the source's credibility, the speaker's/author's authority
Logos: the logic used to support a claim (induction and deduction); can also be the facts and statistics used to help support the argument.
Pathos: the emotional or motivational appeals; vivid language, emotional language and numerous sensory details.
yesterday we discussed Ethos; today we discuss Pathos.
The persuasive appeal of pathos is an appeal to an audience's sense of identity, their self-interest, their emotions. Many rhetoricians over the centuries have considered pathos the strongest of the appeals, though this view of persuasion is rarely mentioned without a lament about the power of emotion to sway the mind.
Join Host Live Chats
- High Frequency Radio Network (28 chatters)
- English Defence League Radio (10 chatters)
- AmyCavanaugh (9 chatters)
- The Spiritual Concepts Show (9 chatters)
- Red River Radio (6 chatters)
- Pastor Harry Walther (5 chatters)
- RICHSISTAH (1 chatters)
- Attune Magazine Radio (1 chatters)
- FreedomizerRadio (1 chatters)
- WGAG Radio (1 chatters)