Email us for help
Loading...
Premium support
Log Out
Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.
This week, episode 17, we're going into the “obstruction” in volume II. We're going to go into the inconsistencies there, omitted information once again leading the public to other than realistic conclusions, and additional information left out that might paint the president in a different light than the present “obstructionist” approach hammered by most media. All of the people on the investigation are part of government. Do you realize what article II is or what it means? It was never part of the report nor was it mentioned in it. What part does article II play in the framing and conclusions people draw when we add the consideration for it that most reporting left out? If you are a person unjustly accused, would you reach out to those involved to be honest about the information they're releasing to the media? How is it obstruction to push back against lies and immoral activity on the part of a law enforcement bureau? Why is it issue to fire someone under article II powers when everyone wanted the person fired BEFORE the whole failed “Russian Collusion” hoax? This week, we're going into this and more.
Broadcast Outline
Broadcast Archives
Fear the Future intro by #Iamwarface
