BlogTalkRadio uses cookies. By using our services, you're agreeing to our Cookies Policy. Got it

Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

Lying for Dollars: Apply Your Understanding of Securitization Claims to Win

  • Broadcast in Finance



Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow THE NEIL GARFIELD SHOW.

Your Honor, this is a standard foreclosure. That is the first lie told in court as lawyers, and companies claiming to be servicers, lenders, or trustees continue to play their game of lying for dollars.

It's obvious I have not simplified the explanation enough because both lawyers and homeowners still mostly don't understand what I am talking about. That means they can't use it effectively, as I have, and that means the judge won't have any idea what you are talking about. 

You can prove that the documents used by your opposition can't be trusted. More importantly, you can prove that the lawyers opposing you cannot be trusted. And that means the opposition must prove their case by reference in well-founded relevant testimony from competent witnesses as to the actual transaction, proof of payment, etc. And they can't do that.

That is how I win. And that is how homeowners across the country have won. And that is how all homeowners are faced with false claims of securitization or false claims of ownership where there is MERS or other signs of claimed securitization in the background. 

So let me take a stab at another type of explanation of what happened. I concede that it is difficult for anyone to comprehend including Wall Street investment bankers. This will be the show tonight --- my attempt at simplifying the explanation of why homeowners should win every time.

This will be an oversimplification. It is an example of the progression of events that occur when a legitimate loan is claimed to be subject to what is called securitization. 

You must be tenacious, persistent and unrelenting to the point where you can clearly demonstrate that the opposition is not complying with either court rules or court orders. That is when you have them in your sights and can shoot down their claim.