Email us for help
Loading...
Premium support
Log Out
Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.
Tonight Neil Garfield and southern California attorney Charles Marshall will discuss the recent Massachussetts case US Bank v. Bolling. For years legal presumptions attached to "facially valid" documents and the banks and servicers were able to argue through their sham surrogates ("successors") that any inquiry beyond the paper trail was irrelevant because the the issue had already been decided in the early motions of the case wherein those legal presumptions were used to sustain the implied perspective of the banks, servicers, and their surrogate successors. The tide has changed.
Charles Marshall, Esq. attorney in Northern California joins us again as the featured attorney. Charles has been a long time supporter of the livinglies blog and has contributed to the analysis and strategies that are reported on the blog. He has exceptional critical thinking skills and the ability to understand the strategic winds that are blowing. Things are changing rapidly. We'll be talking about Yvanova, Keshtgar, Lundy, TILA Rescission and current trends.
Charles Marshall
Law Offices of Charles T. Marshall
415 Laurel St., #405
San Diego, CA 92101
cmarshall@marshallestatelaw.com
Phone 619.723.7071
Fax 866.575.7413