SORT BY Relevancy
Gun Control & Historical Racism
As Black Americans we must realize that gun control laws, from a historical perspective, serve one purpose, to keep us vulnerable and more easily oppressed. This is not conjecture or rhetoric, it is easily documented fact.
Join us, Alex Primo and Asha Zuri, Thursday October 8th at 9 PM EST as we explore the way America sought to disarm Melanated individuals across the land as part of a ruthless plot to control, intimidate, and in many cases murder innocent slaves and freed men alike.
Brendan O’Neill of the Guardian notes:
Throughout the 1800's, states passed gun-control laws that were fundamentally racist. So, panicked by the prospect of more black rebellions against white landowners, the North Carolina Supreme Court passed a statute in 1840 that said: “If any free negro, mulatto, or free person of color shall wear or carry about his or her person, or keep in his or her house, any shotgun, musket, rifle, pistol, sword, dagger or bowie-knife… he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be indicted therefore.”
In 1941, a judge in Florida’s Supreme Court called the laws into question when he overturned the conviction of a black man for carrying a handgun without a permit. He overturned the conviction, he said, because this law “was passed for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers … and to give the white citizens in sparsely settled areas a better feeling of security. The statute was never intended to be applied to the white population and in practice has never been so applied.”
All of this plus brother Dennis Jefferson will be dropping by with another fantastic episode of Healthy Matters.
Call in to participate at (917)889-2830
Log on here to just listen to the show.
And Remember, Always Keep It Real and Keep It On Point. #One
Jean Hoffman is one of Michigan's Safe Delivery Consultants and was essential in the implementation of the Safe Delivery Statute in 2000. She has been responsible for increasing public awareness and creating an infrastructure to insure it's sustainability. Learn how adoption works alongside this law and how you can promote it in your community. Don't miss this informative discussion!
A Genius and Legacy of Robert Welch's Insights - Two Speeches At the JBS Council Dinner in Los Angeles, March 9th, 1974
John Birch Society Founder, Robert Welch in his first speech, he quotes himself from 1958 at the JBS Founding Meeting About Insiders Knowledge and Long-Range Plans For America.
His Second Speech, Which Took Place at the 1974 JBS Council Dinner, Mr. Welch Looks 15 Years Into the Future of America.
UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR "FAIR USE" FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL, OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF "FAIR USE".
Standard YouTube LicenseTHE SCARIEST MOVIE EVER MADE | KJ Ozborne https://youtu.be/fXtAMso1d2s via @YouTube
As a courtesy, we note that on the spreadsheet there is one open matter that involves you (Carmen Sabatino v. City of Modesto, Case No. 620253). It is our understanding that Meyers Nave successfully defended the City in a lawsuit you filed challenging the City’s conduct related to the Charter amendment to create Council districts. In the course of litigation, you filed an amended complaint. The City instructed Meyers Nave to file a motion to strike the amended complaint pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute. The City prevailed in its anti-SLAPP action, and was awarded all of the attorney’s fees it sought in its motion for attorney’s fees relating to the anti-SLAPP action. This matter is still open because the City has not received payment.
Myron Fagan exposes the Illuminati | CFR  ../
Published on Apr 12, 2015
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Originally Published on Aug 12, 2013 By "The Crypt" Youtube Channel
Secret society known as The Illuminati, and their New World Order.
Mr. Fagan describes with documentary evidence how the ILLUMINATI became the instrument of the House of Rothschild to achieve a "One World Government".
Mr. Fagan relentlessly uncovered plots for major historical events. Myron Fagan is considered to be the archetype for the PCT (Paranoid Conspiracy Theorist)
This Recording is one of the most interesting and yet horrifying, factual stories of some of the most sensational plots in the history of the world.
IT'S NOT "TRUTH" UNTIL YOU DECIDE ..../
in Self Help
Lee Parker’s life changed forever at the age of 12. While under the care of Child and Youth Services Lee was placed in a group home where he would meet his abuser.
His abuser was a staff member who he got along with very well.
Lee was allowed to go home with this staff member on house visits and then overnight visits.
His abuser became his foster father and a month later began sexually abusing Lee for the next year and a half. Lee would be at school one day visibly upset and not wanting to go “home.” A school nurse would spend the time to hear his story and intervene.
Now at the age of 31, finally coming to terms with what happened to him, he is finding the statutes of limitations is working against him.
Join us in a conversation about the frustrations survivors confront concerning a crime that they can’t prosecute because of statute of limitations that prohibit it. In many state the rape of an adult has no limitation. The rape of a child is defined differently and we begin to see many differences. If you follow the link below you begin to see that while on the surface it will appear that there is none, a real look show the discrepancies.
LA Lawyer Patricia Rodriguez (TILA Rescission is boiling over the top. And there are differences between non-judicial states and judicial states. The main problem though is that desperate homeowners are hearing something different than the real message: rescission is as close to a magic bullet as we have seen but it is still susceptible to multiple issues in litigation. Rescission is certainly effective upon mailing and that appears to be true even if the notice is wrongfully sent. The burden of vacating the rescission is on the so-called lender. But there are still circumstances where the notice of rescission itself may well render it void even if mailed. Admitting that the transaction was consummated on a specific date where the rescission letter itself has both the consumamtion date and the date of mailing might encourage judges to strike down the rescission or vacate it because it is void on tis face if the notice was sent after the three year period. It is true that the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense and that the ability to raise an affirmative defense depends upon your standing to raise the issue. Patricia Rodriguez agrees that the argument could still be made that the rescission is effective but the more information on the recission, the more likely the Judge will find the rescission void on its face even if mailed.
Learn the maze of the UCC with Dave.
(1) "assigned estate" means all the real and personal estate of an assigning debtor passing to the consenting creditors under an assignment by virtue of Section 23.02 or 23.09(b) of this code;
Sec. 23.02. NATURE AND EFFECT OF ASSIGNMENT. (a) A debtor may assign his real and personal estate under this chapter to an assignee for the benefit of the debtor's creditors.
ll provide in the as(b) An assigning debtor shasignmentfor distribution of all his real and personal estate to each consenting creditor in proportion to each consenting creditor's claim.
(c) The assigning debtor shall sign the inventory required by Subsection (b) of this section and swear that it is just and true.
A) authenticated by a secured party;
(7) "Authenticate" means:
(A) to sign; or
(B) with present intent to adopt or accept a record, to attach to or logically associate with the record an electronic sound, symbol, or process.
10) "Certificate of title" means a certificate of title with respect to which a statute provides for the security interest in question to be indicated on the certificate as a condition or result of the security interest's obtaining priority over the rights of a lien creditor with respect to the collateral.
(12) "Collateral" means the property subject to a security interest or agricultural lien.
The parties were invited to attend a meeting at which the borrowers signed the papers. The originator is usually not in attendance. The closing agent, usually a title agent, takes the signed documents into escrow. At some later time the alleged loan is "funded" by a wire transfer from an unknown source. The borrower believes that the originator is loaning him the money. In truth it was a "table-funded" loan in which the name of the actual lender was actively concealed from the borrower and the actual "loan" was not funded until some time after the meeting. Later the mortgage is recorded and the note is released from escrow and sent to someone whom the closing agent assumes to be authorized to receive it. When was consummation?
Later the successors to the loan documents will allege that the loan closing was "consummated" at the time of signing, but that is not right. If there was a consummation of the loan at all it didn't occur until hours, days, weeks or months or even years after the meeting. It is a question of fact as to when the alleged loan was consummated. And if there was a table-funded loan there might have been no consummation at all. Instead whoever the real lender is might have some claim for quantum meruit or unjust enrichment to get their money back but if they raise that claim they cannot do it using the note and mortgage. So when does the three day period commence for rescission? When does the three year period begin for rescission? Is there a time when the borrower is prohibited by statue from sending the notice of rescission? And what happens if some company steps up and complies and then asks for the money? They don't have to object to rescission --- they can agree. If rescission is effective when mailed, who can vacate it?
| yeH’ggu t’Izaz [y’h’new] | Chukat | "Decree of / Statute"
Hebrews 9:11-28; John 3:10-21
| yeH’ggu t’Izaz [y’h’new] | Chukat | "Decree of / Statute"
Hebrews 9:11-28; John 3:10-21
The social oppression and castration of black men is rooted in race and gender. Intersectional theories that explicitly or implicitly suggest that black men are privileged by gender are thus flawed. Black men, instead, are also the victims of “gendered racism.”
Indeed, there is a gender analysis implicit in the notion that white supremacy “castrates” black
men – castration itself is an act of gendered racism. Historically, blackmen have thus been targeted for certain types of treatment – including castration – because they are both black and male. Therefore, although men constitute the dominant and privileged group within American society, black men convey a “subordinated masculinity.” Black masculinity
as a subordinated form of masculinity arises because the interplay between racial and socioeconomic prejudices prevents black males, as individuals, from reaping the full benefits of male class privilege.
The legal system, moreover, has served as a primary instrument of oppression, carving out the racialized sphere of subordinated masculinity. According to critical race theorists, the law does not merely reflect,
mediate, and arbitrate preexisting race relations. Rather, the law “constitutes, constructs and produces races and race relations in a way that supports” white racial power and subordination. The transformative powerof law in shaping race relations is reflected in a 1697 Pennsylvania statute that imposed the penalty of castration for a black man who attempted