SORT BY Relevancy
The Center for Security Policy’s report, Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases evaluates 50 Appellate Court cases from 23 states that involve conflicts between Shariah (Islamic law) and American state law.
These cases are the stories of Muslim American families, mostly Muslim women and children, who were asking American courts to preserve their rights to equal protection and due process. These families came to America for freedom from the discriminatory and cruel laws of Shariah. When our courts then apply Shariah law in the lives of these families, and deny them equal protection, they are betraying the principles on which America was founded.
The study’s findings suggest that Shariah law has entered into state court decisions, in conflict with the Constitution and state public policy. Some commentators have said there are no more than one or two cases of Shariah law in U.S. state court cases; yet we found 50 significant cases just from the small sample of appellate published cases.
1. WILL SHARIA LAW RULE?
2. SHARIA LAW: Definition -
6. OKLAHOMA'S BAN ON SHARIA LAW STRUCK DOWN:
7. THE FUTURE OF TERRORISM:
8. SEVEN PHASES
9. PHASE 1 - THE AWAKENING:
10. PHASE 2 - OPENING EYES:
11. PHASE 3 - ARISING AND STANDING UP:
12. PHASE 4 - GOVERNMENTS COLLAPSE:
13. PHASE 5 - GLOBAL ISLAMIC STATE:
14. PHASE 6 - TOTAL CONFRONTATION:
15. PHASE 7 - DEFINITIVE VICTORY:
Islamic extremists have intermediate political goals which they believe will pave the way for the global implementation of Sharia. One of these goals is the removal of non-Muslim military forces from Muslim lands and the overthrow of “enemy” regimes. Acts of Islamic extremism includes terrorism, human rights abuses, the advancement of Sharia based governance, bigotry towards non-Muslims, Jews, Homosexuals, Atheists, all other religions and rival Muslims and overall hostility to the West. Yet, The United States allows radical Turkish citizens to enter the country and pays their way through college, while American students can not pay for education and are not adequately funded.
Islam is not civil religion,but primany hatred. It usus sharia law to do rapacious, rogue and criminal deeds againt people, the words of a evil man from a deluded mind.
If you are paying attention, Islam and Sharia law are aggressively trying to take over America. Islam's dream is the creation of an Islamic state in the US & their strategy in America is to use America’s freedom and liberties against us in order to achieve that dream. President Obama has just admitted that he has no intention of keeping Americans safe from Islamist aggression here or abroad. Obama has gone to great lengths to shield and encourage aggressive Islamist infl
According to Conservative Infidel: Dearborn as a Template For Sharia in America The seeds of change have already been sown here in America. Barack Hussein Obama’s vision of Sharia Law enslaving the United States has already successfully germinated in the petrie dish that is Dearborn, Michigan. The videos you are about to see are far from professional, but they are real and chilling. America....Let's Debate
Join host Bill Yarbrough as he invites two different perspectives on Muslims in America. Usama Dakdok is an active Christian educator on the nature of Islam. Usama was born in Egypt and is now a Baptist minister and founder of Straight Way of Grace Minitry. Will Coley is a constitutionalist speaker, advocate for limited government, and Director of Muslims for Liberty.
Kirk Stange talks about the dangers of posting on social media sites during family law, divorce and custody litigation. This is based on an article on an article on www.stangelawfirm.com titled Steve Nash case shows how the use of Twitter in a custody case can be important.
Having locations in St. Louis, St. Charles, Jefferson County, Franklin County in Missouri and St. Clair County, Madison County and Monroe County by appoint only in Illinois, you can contact Stange Law Firm and their Divorce Attorneys in St. Charles, Missouri and Divorce Lawyers in St. Louis, Missouri online at 314-963-4700.
Disclaimer: The information provided is general in nature, and may not apply to a specific factual or legal circumstance. An attorney and client relationship should not be implied. Nothing in this episode is intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney. Therefore, if you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction.
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri/Illinois nor The Missouri/Illinois Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wallach On Law: Featuring - Charles N. Curlett, Jr., Peter Mills
Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to islam.
The ObamaCare bill is the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia muslim diktat in the United States . Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be "gambling", "risk-taking" and "usury" and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this.
OKLAHOMA'S BAN ON SHARIA LAW STRUCK DOWN:
The proposed constitutional amendment also would have barred state courts from applying or considering "international law."
"The court got it right," said Chandra Bhatnagar, senior attorney with the ACLU's Human Rights Program. "The Supreme Court has held that international law is part of our law. Moreover, our Constitution requires ratified treaties to be treated as the supreme law of the land. Preventing courts from considering foreign or international law raises serious questions about the separation of powers and the independence of courts and judges."
"This law unfairly singled out one faith and one faith only," said Ryan Kiesel, executive director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. "This amendment was nothing more than a solution in search of a problem. We’re thrilled that it has been struck down."
7. THE FUTURE OF TERRORISM:
8. SEVEN PHASES
On this episode of Understanding the Law Radio, Host Peter J. Lamont, Esq. gives a primer on default judgments. He explains what a default judgment is and how you can vacate one if it has been obtained by the plaintiff against you. Peter also goes over the week in review where he discusses last weeks notable legal news.
About the Host:
Peter Lamont is much more than just a nationally recognized attorney and business advisor. Peter has a professional background in broadcast communications and journalism. Understanding the Law is his way of fusing the law and business with his love of broadcast journalism and media production. In Peter’s opinion, there is no better way to communicate quality business and legal information or advice than through video, streaming audio and related media sources.
Our guests have included top business executives, best-selling authors, radio and television personalities, controversial figures, entrepreneurs and more. In general, guests discuss their backgrounds, struggles, accomplishments, business and success philosophies, legal views and other related business, personal development and legal topics and opinions.
Today we will discuss the Supreme Court decision in Riley v. California, and welcome Bronson James, the attorney who co-authored the brief submitted in Riley v. California on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Prior to becoming a lawyer, Mr. James worked as a Data and Technology Privacy Engineer, and continues to consult on issues of data security and privacy. And continuing our coverage of the crisis at Men's Central Jail in Los Angeles -- whose conditions the Department of Justice has recently called "deplorable" -- we welcome Darryl Lewis and Robert Pickett, who were incarcerated at Men's Central Jail for 32 months prior to being acquitted at trial. The story of their arrest is as unfathomable as the conditions of their confinement.