SORT BY Relevancy
In the first hour we talked about Sandra Fluke's statement that that the girls being held captive by Boko Haram should “count themselves lucky” they weren't being held captive by Republicans. We also talked about the effort to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill and replace him with a woman. In the second hour we talked about the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. What makes a citizen? Is Ted Cruz eligible to be president? Are "anchor babies" legal? Does equal protection under the law apply to same-sex marriage? Let's talk about it and I'll take calls on these topics.
14th Amendment SECTION. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Top 20 Myths Pushed by the Homosexual Activists by Bill Muehlenberg
Originalism and Marriage by Ed Whelan
Marbury, Obergefell, and Unconstitutional Supreme Court Decisions–Part 1 by Robert Lowry Clinton
THE 14TH AMENDMENT & YOU WITH BRO. RON MARCH
LET’S GO DOWN THE RABITT HOLE
TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2015… 6 p C/7 p E… Call /Listen/ Chat~ 347-637-3074
Discussion and Questions with Ron March of The Ron March Show in Detroit!
The 14th amendment to the US Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868 during the Reconstruction era. It, along with the 13th and 15th amendments are collectively known as the Reconstruction amendments. Its broad goal was to ensure that the Civil Rights Act passed in 1866 would remain valid ensuring that "all persons born in the United States...excluding Indians not taxed...." were citizens and were to be given "full and equal benefit of all laws." (Quotes from the Civil Rights Act of 1866) However, it went beyond the provisions of the Civil Rights Act in many ways.
4 Key Clauses:
State and federal citizenship for all persons regardless of race both born or naturalized in the United States was reaffirmed.
No state would be allowed to abridge the "privileges and immunities" of citizens.
No person was allowed to be deprived of life, liberty,or property without "due process of law."
No person could be denied "equal protection of the laws."
Tune in as Ron March discusses the 14 TH amendment and what we should know.
Join in the lively discussions that always take place at THE LOTUS PLACE!
HOST ~THE LOTUS PLACE
CO ~HOST /PRODUCER~DR.RANDY SHORT
CREATIVE DIRECTOR ~QUEEN ZOLA
MUSIC ~SAKHELE SESHIBE
The 14th amendment Civil Rights law of the United States constitutation, when read in coherent context, does not reinvent the intrinsic conjugal female and male union. It does not in any way intimate that a reason was extant to warrant a law that broaden and extend marriage beyond the reproductive design of woman and man. In a 5-4 decision penned by Justice Anthony Kennedy and joined by the court's liberal wing, the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage across the entire country Friday morning. Legalizing same-sex weddings isn't just a threat to traditional marriage for Scalia. Nay, it is a sign of democracy's downfall. Also he goes out of his way to bash fellow justices as pretentious poets. Scalia said; The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic
Unbelievable but true. The case of “International Franchise Association vs. City of Seattle” is now being heard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The franchisers are claiming that a living wage violates their Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The members of the International Franchise Association claim the city of Seattle showed “animus” – or hostility – to corporations because the law goes after corporations as a disfavored minority. That means corporations think their civil liberties are being violated just like ex-slaves of the 19th century. It sounds surreal but the International Franchise Association with outside financial assistance has hired conservative corporate lawyer Paul Clements who is famous for arguing cases before the Supreme Court. It’s a country gone mad. Listen and understand the insanity. WIth my guest Ron Fein of Free Speech for People. The Tim Danahey Show discusses economics, government, social issues, history, and non-fiction books in a magazine format featuring in-depth conversations with guests. Politics and inflammatory conversations are discouraged as they are divisive and counter-productive. Instead, the show seeks under-reported topics and delves into facts, different perspectives, and ramifications of each perspective. The show does not espouse a political agenda. Danahey’s strength is to take complex subjects, talk with experts and make them comprehensible and entertaining for average listeners
Join us as we discuss the little known consequences of the 14th amenment. Did you know you are a dual citizen? In a number of ways, the 14th amendement allowed for the comunization of the entire United States. Very interesting discussion - you should seek out the book "The Red Amendment" as there is no way to address the brevity of this legal tragedy in an hour show or few pages. It is very hard for the average american to read thru the wording used in the 14 ammendment, and they did that on purpose. We read it verbatum, and discuss what each section of it means.
WE'RE SORRY FOR THE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT SO HERE IS A NEW BROADCAST OF THE SHOW. ANCHOR BABIES: WHAT THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT REALLY SAYS WILL RUN SATURDAY AFTERNOON. MY COLLEAGUE, MARK COLLIER, WILL JOIN ME TO DISCUSS THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CITIZENSHIP CLAUSE AS WRITTEN BY SENATOR JACOB HOWARD OF MICHIGAN IN 1866. THE WORDS "SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF" HAVE BEEN ERRONEOUSLY USED FOR GENERATIONS WHICH HAS ALLOWED THOUSANDS OF CLAIMS TO CITIZENSHIP CONTRARY TO THE INTENT OF THE FRAMERS. WE'LL TALK ABOUT THIS AND RELATED FACTORS SATURDAY AFTERNOON AT 2. IF YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE ONGOING INVASION OF AMERICA AND ITS ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, YOU MIGHT WANT TO LISTEN.
Show time 8AM-10AM EST
Do you know what the 14th really says? Maybe you do, maybe you don't. Get ready for some possible controversial interpretations of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. Two fellow "experts" in the field of political commentary will be joining me as we talk about the good, the bad and the ugly of the 14th. This discussion will surely be thought provoking. The online chat room will be open and if you want to join the conversation live on air just call 855-236-2486.
Around 9:15AM EST Congressman and ex-Governor of South Carolina will join me as we discuss several important issues. Budget issues, national security issues, like the USA Freedom Act and the recent vote on the National Defense Authorization Act in the House are certainly on my list.
Yep, I have a feeling it just might be an interesting day "In the Pickle Barrel".
Podcast #272 starts with the monologue from the August 18, 2015 Glenn Beck television program. Such sets the so called stage for a journey back to the past and the fallacy of modern day political correctness with regards to the religion of Islam and the modern day political disregard of its ramifications to American lifestyles. What is taking place halfway across the world has happened here in America over 200 years ago. One of the hot button political issues of today is that of the US border and illegal immigration, that issue is well over 300 years old; the difference centers around this word however: EMIGRATED rather than immigration. This podcast presents an off the wall - politically - perspective of the 14th amendment regarding the action of emigrated verses immigrated. Thus the pertinent question for today is this: Do words still have original meanings (i.e. intent) and substance; for example - A firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence? What about our sacred Honor? The end of this podcast expands to consider other topics and issues from the 1800’s that are being discussed nowadays. So here’s one bottom line folks: There are plenty of new things under the sun [Cf. Eccl.1:9]; however there are no new attitudes under the sun. American history will prove that bottom line to be true as this podcast superficially considered how the American - native -Indians had been emigrated by a government, then and today, that forgot about the primary Declaration that contained and stated these words - OUR sacred Honor AND the Biblical distinction between bondage and slavery.