storesworld  

AMD and Intel both companies in a notebook battery Laptop Battery life capabilities of the tongue competition have increased recently. AMD has publicly declared that the recent Intel in promoting their own notebook technology, the user intentionally provided false information on the notebook battery life, adding that Intel used for propaganda Mobilemark test data, and are not well reflect the actual use of batteries in case of performance. Last month, some even went so far Intel sue on the courtroom, saying Intel's own platform on the use of notebook battery life, the life of the existence of false propaganda and advertising is Presario R3000(compaq r3000 battery) suspect.

However, according to "The Seattle Times" report, Intel said that the plaintiff's statement does not hold water because they believed that the notebook battery test results can be very accurately reflect the actual majority of people use laptops, and to deny the existence of their own propaganda false elements.

The plaintiff alleged the existence of false suspicion of battery Presario X6000 life test, the use of BAPCO's MobileMark software, the organization carried out, BAPCO is a Intel, AMD, Dell, Hewlett-Packard co-founded several companies and other non-profit organizations. But this case, the plaintiff claims that Intel is the BAPCO behind the black hands, but Intel has denied this argument, saying members of the joint development MobileMark is a BAPCO results.

AMD believes that the absence of set display performance testing links, so MobileMark software, test results and does not reflect the overall performance of notebook. While the AMD's Patrick Moorhead executives think this is a seriously mislead consumers. Saying that if you use other software to test laptop battery life tested, then the AMD notebook chip, Intel notebook chip products Pavilion ZV5000(hp zv5000 battery) and the gap between products would no longer exist.