SORT BY Relevancy
Laci Green is a youtube feminist. She recently told us all about objectification.
In simple terms objectification is about how male sexual urges hurt women. When men feel desire for women they have to be carefully policed least they remove women’s humanity with their thoughts.
Of course this requires believing that men victimize women with their illuminati voodoo eye balls. Or maybe they’re space reptiles with thought controlling mind rays.
But most importantly it requires believing that women’s sexual desires are passive, while men’s are active and villainous. It requires believing women are sexual objects defined by how they are acted upon by men.
Join us tonight on Honey Badger Radio as we discus “Feminism objectifies Laci Green.”
JohntheOther's Laci Green: I, Object
Sage Gerard's Here Be Dragons
Men's Rights versus Feminism Explained Using Magnets
Why do we give women a free pass. Why is it that we excuse women when they murder children, or when they murder men. Why is the grotesque and nearly inconceivable sexual mutilation of a human being funny if the knife is wielded by a woman. Why do we provide a free pass for violence and criminal conduct for a group pf people we all pretend to believe are self actualized adults?
This is not solely the work of feminism, but it is certainly something escalated by that ideology of gender. So what's going on, and why in a feminized society do we give a free pass to women for action and behavior that would be totally unacceptable, behavior that is properly described by the word monstrous , when its done by women.
As rational adults, we excuse outrageous behavior for other people too. Toddlers, and the mentally defective. Isn't the free pass we give women an implicit claim that they're either toddlers – or mentally defective?
Thursday night on a voice for men – Girl Writes W hat, the Wooly BumbleBee and Johntheother on taking a pass on the free pass.
Call in at 310 388 9709
Dear feminists, I see you, and I hear you, and I notice the knife in your hand, and the machine gun drawn on your placard. I get it, you’re not kidding, and I know you are not speaking metaphorically. You want to kill. We all get that you are entirely serious. But your violence – as you obviously dial it upwards will not be met. It will not be answered and you are uninvited from the rumble.
But where are you going with this brutality? Do you really want this to devolve to a street-fight? Really?
John the Other, Girl Writes What Paul Elam and James Huff will not be at the rumble, but they'll all be on AVFM this week
Well it's thursday again, and that means A Voice for Men radio is coming on in a few hours over at blogtalkradio.com / avoiceformen – and Girl Writes What, Woolly Bumblebee, James Huff, and me, Johntheother will be on to talk about stuff. But what stuff exactly is it this week?
This is the second episode of AVFM radio for 2013, and in case you haven't noticed 2012 was a hell of a year for the men's rights movement. So much so that the landscape, the tides and even gravity are not arranged in the ways they have been for most of our lifetimes. So tonight on AVFM radio, we'll be talking about what that means for the human rights of men and boys, and more specifically, what that means in terms of real hazard and physical risk for individuals in this human rights movement. This is not a show for you to miss.
And we'll also be inviting the directors and members of the national organization for women to join us on air on A Voice for Men Radio, and sending Arthur Goldwag of the souther poverty law center a text message reminding him to pick up a couple flats of beer before he comes for dinner. - tonight, on a voice for men radio.
Her body, her choice. Her body, her choice.
Anyone who questions this particular mantra is most definitely a villain; a cackling cad in a cape, twirling his mustache as he ties a crying damsel to the train tracks.
But there are some unexamined assumptions at the core of “her body, her choice” and foremost among them is that, somehow, society respects men’s bodily autonomy more then women’s. Let me say that again. Society respects men’s bodily autonomy more then women’s. Heh. Yeah. Join JohntheOther, Typhonblue and Girl Writes What as we take a look at “her body, her choice” and ask ourselves, “what about his body, his choice?”
We are all creeps now. The word, of course is the definitive and the preferred tool of social exclusion by the good people. The non creeps. If you're one of us, that is, if you're a creep, your opinions are wrong, by definition, you are undesirable, you're not sexy, you're not attractive, and its only a matter of time before vultures begin circling your carcass. But what exactly does the word mean, besides “we don't like you” What is the actual meaning of the modern usage of the word creep?
Tonight on A Voice for men radio, John The Creep, Girl Creeps What and Typhon Crepe Bleu will lift the lid on the conceptual box labeled creep, and examine just what a creep is, and why you're a creep too.
Where are the good men going? The answer being, obviously, the same place good men have always gone: to an early grave, or a nicely appointed cage. Bad men, on the other hand, are going somewhere else. Anywhere else, in fact, wherever they want, without concern for who tells them no. Men going tier own way, and Zeta Masculinity, the modern paths to male self actualization without necessary self sacrifice on behalf of those who hate them are the topics for the 26 April 2012 episode of AVFM Radio. GirlWritesWhat, Johntheother, and TyphonBlue will be wrestling with what it takes to shake off the mental shackles of a society which discounts male humanity and values only male utility. The social contract between men and women is broken, burned and bombed into rubble, and those who've bombed it provide no replacement except a cage for men. What will replace this contract is still largely unknown, but a few ideas are currently in beta-test now.
Call in tonight at 8PM central standard time 310-388-9709
This is not the sexual objectification you are accustomed to hearing of. This is not objectification of individuals as objects of desire or beauty. The true objectification of human beings occurs when we treat them as disposable utilities, use them to the point of destruction, and then discard them like store brand appliances from wall mart. Male rape victims, thrown away and refused treatment by UN aid agencies – because once they’re broken, they’re no longer men, and thus, not human. American veterans shattered by their combat experiences, returned home to be discarded. And unlike females who are objectified as items of desire or beauty, and thus protected and coveted, men objectified are discarded as actual objects, and abandoned to die. They are also invisible, and never discussed under the heading of sexual objectification.
Today on AVfM, JtO and GWW ask the question – Is feminism nothing more than an elaborate political framework for psychopathy? Examining the produced outcomes of a half century of feminist activism, are active feminists anything except violent criminals – constructing a huge framework of smoke and mirrors to excuse ongoing violent and antisocial behavior? What is the difference between antisocial and violent behavior and feminism? Can a real humanist movement really generate this much hate, including public calls for male extermination, child abuse, mutilation? Would real humanists have laughed at the violent mutilation by Catherine Becker of her husband? Would a humanist movement engage in public parades and fly banners reading dis-arm the police, arm the feminists – and Exterminate men now. Would humanists persistently stage anti violence campaigns which ignore the demographic who is most victimized by violence?
Call in tonight at 310 388 9709
What does the phrase, endlessly repeated in our media “women and children” tell us. Whenever there is a tragedy, a disaster, or a report of the deaths of people, we hear this phrase “women and children”. This is what makes a tragedy special. This is what makes us, the listeners at home sit up, and take notice. It is the code phrase which tells us who we should care about, and who matters in the calculus of human damage. Women and children are the ones who matter. Men, but the implication of constant exclusion, even in mention of the deaths of men, they dont matter. And we – as human beings, if we happen to be men, those never mentioned humans whose humanity is hidden behind the names of our jobs when we die, we are constantly reminded by the special mention of women and children, that we do not count. We are not humans, and our only worth is in our use to the humans who do matter. Women, and to a lesser degree, children.
Technology is the name for a body of human accomplishment which has levered our species out of a subsistence, survival based existence to a modern culture of plentiful food, modern medicine, transportation, art, philosophy and affluent prosperity. But technology also enables us to place great distance between the initiation of actions and their execution. This is particularly true in the practice of violence, and in war. But the great separation between initiation of the use of force, and execution also allows detachment, and it's in this great gap that a malevolent and pathological ethic can grow.
Tonight on AVfM Radio JTO, GWW discuss whether proxy violence is the practice of an ethic of evil.
If masculinity is evil, predatory, regressive atavism – which is what the proponents of radical feminism seem to believe, then male spaces, or places in human society which are male oriented, male friendly without apology without polite curtaining of male identity in deference to women – such places cannot possibly be allowed. Female spaces, that is, places where female identity dominates to the total exclusion of men are relatively common, and indeed, almost all public space shared by women is governed with an ethic of deference to female emotion and sensibility. However, in a healthy, functional society which acknowledged the existence of men and women, as humans, both Female and Male friendly spaces are necessary feature of the landscape. So where are the male spaces in modern society, and how do we get them back? JtO, GWW and TyphonBlue get busy tonight with some necessary groundwork, rebuilding male space in western society.
Join Host Live Chats
- High Frequency Radio Network (29 chatters)
- The Heart of the MatterDr Weissman (7 chatters)
- WGAG Radio (6 chatters)
- thedean (5 chatters)
- remoteviewerBrendaBradshawshow (4 chatters)
- The Emotional Pro (3 chatters)
- FlyLady (2 chatters)
- RituRana (2 chatters)
- Independent Artists and Thinkers (2 chatters)
- SASSY Biz Radio (1 chatters)
- When Christians Speak (1 chatters)