SORT BY Relevancy
Gus Venegas was born in 1952 a few months before after a Bautista's coup that ended fifty years of democracy and civil liberties in Cuba. Nearly all of Gus' kin supported a Revolution that supported a return of the Republic. The Venegas family witnessed the transformation of the Cuban Revolution into the Western Hemisphere's most oppressive political, economic, and cultural dictatorship. They left Cuba in 1966 when Castro and President Johnson agreed to a legal and orderly departure of Cuban exiles.
Venegas is the author of Memories from the Land of the Intolerant Tyrant. Venegas says this book which details life under Castro, is his vegeance. "The truth is our vengeance".
Tags: Gus Venegas, Castro, Cuba, tyrant, dictator, revolution, Obama, communism, Bay of Pigs, Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK
THE EXCEPTIONAL ONE, KEN MCCLENTON, NIGHTLY DELVES INTO THE CHALLENGES FACED BY CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS WITHIN SOCIETY'S CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS--INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY, EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, GOVERNMENT AND FAITH--WITH A UNIQUE URBAN TWIST.
MONDAYS THROUGH THURSDAYS AT 9:00 PM EST.
FROM THE LAND
OF THE INTOLERANT TYRANT".
THE EXCEPTIONAL CONSERVATIVE SHOW
ACNATION RADIO NETWORK
PUNDIT PRESS RADIO
INNERSIGHT - Why are people with disabilities intolerant to other disabled people?
Frank Perino - Host
Suzanne Tarazi-Ferraro - Co-Host
INNERSIGHT Means 'FREEDOM'
Advocates for the Disabled
Before we discuss the when and why of racism being socially and polically acceptable again in America, let's see if we can decide what racism is. America fully understood racism in the 50s & 60s. Whites explained it then as that's the way things are. That's the way it is supposed to be. Black people were to know and stay in their place. White people were not to voice any other opinon. Today, there is a crumped up different meant to racism. Some will say racism is being intolerate of an entire race of people. This I don't buy, the reason being if racism is being intolerant of a group of people, explain how you are being intolerant toward me and people who look like me. Being visably intolerant is to show up in decision making toward me. Being visably intolerant is behaviour that becomes part of my life and my life's choices. That word racism is applied when visably there are actions involved that harm individuals that are members of a group of people. Black people! There is another part of racism that make racism America's reality. The other part is White priviledge. If racism is intolerance for an entire group than White priviledge is acceptance of an entire group. Could a White person be racist toward his own group of other White people? If there is such a thing as White priviledge, is there also Black priviledge? Do both White priviledge and Black priviledge have the same behaviours and consequences in our society? Now, why is racism now politically and socially acceptable in America here in 2014? My answer is because the elite was once above showing racism. Since 2008 the elite put a stamp of approval on racist actions and language and those who worship the corruption of the elite took up the cause. Racist remarks are again acceptable and those not willing to partake could find themselves friendless. Recall pre 70's USA!
Hot Button Family,
Without question, the most intolerant group of people I have ever encountered, are those who profess that there is no God!
Atheists in America have been politically and socially assaulting Christianity since the turn of the 20th Century. From the Scopes Monkey Trial, to cutting the microphone of valedictorians who give praise to a creator, Atheists target of intolerance has overwhelmingly been the Christian faith.
By doing the following, atheists attempt to legitimize their assault for the social persecution of Christians in America:
1. Presenting half-truths and false information about Christianity....Hitler was not a Christian
2. Pitting the study of Science against the belief in God...One does not overwrite the other
3. Interfering with the rights of how we raise our children as believers, and the influence Christian parents should have in their children's school
We are going to touch the following topics:
Why a person cannot claim Christianity and stand with a party that boo's God
Why Science and Christianity compliment, not conflict on another
'Why Atheists are intolerant to Christians
Why America is a Christian nation
In addition, I will spend the last 15 minutes debating an secularists, or anti-Christian, in the middle of the segment.
YES MHBT....THIS ONE IS GOING TO BE HOTT!!!!!
Evidence abounds: Scholarly studies show that mainstream journalists are overwhelmingly liberal, yet many deny it, and many honestly don't even see the biases they bring to their selection and reporting of the "news." For example:
Environmentalists extrapolate this mindset in their approach to scores of issues, traveling utterly quixotic paths and pursuing devastatingly expensive larks while dismissing skeptics as flat-earthers. Obama constantly refers to his ideas as self-evidently reasonable and Republicans' as driven solely by partisanship, because how could they possibly oppose his reality-based proposals? As a conservative, I believe that many liberals proceed from good intentions, though I think their consistently horrendous results entitle us to some skepticism after a while even as to their intentions — or at least to their ability to see past their oppressive biases.
Liberals lie to their constituents!
Ther are the most intolerant people I know.
They do not state who they are or what they truly believe.
Themedia covers up for them.
They love big government!
They sphew out phony unemployment numbers.
They protect weak politicans, they would have protected Adolph Hitler, Stalin, Hugo Chavez, and other ruthless dictators.
Firstly, this will be a test of my microphone and I will be making a short broadcast to see if I can improve the quality of my broadcasting.
But also, I will be asking why the paranormal broadcasters on blogtalk radio are afraid of me. Why do they censor me and block me from their chatrooms? I merely go there and state MY differing opinion about Bigfoot, Psychics, Angels, Aliens, Faities, etc. The minute they see I have a different opinion than they do, they block me. Really, is that what you are about? If someone has a different point of view you can't even tolerate it on your broadcast? YIKES!!! Maybe you're not so certain about your philosophy after all, huh? Hey, I'm not trying to convert the cement heads here. They are going to believe no matter what. I'm more interested in the pshchological dynamics of why people have become so intolerant of other ideas & opinions and why a difference of opinion now equals "I Hate You!!!!"
We live in a world that increasingly strives to (supposedly) promote the idea of tolerance, but actually becomes intolerant of Christian absolutes as it does so. Whether it involves religion, behavior, or human sexuality, there is a growing anti-Christian sentiment in America and other Western nations. Ultimately, built into this “tolerance” is the concept that truth is determined by each individual, not by God. This has led many people to conclude that making judgments on anyone (especially coming from Christians) is wrong because the Bible says ”judge not” (Matthew 7:1). Interestingly enough, those who reject the notion of God or the credibility of the Bible often attempt to use God’s Word (e.g., by quoting verses out of context) to excuse their actions when they are presented with the gospel and the plight of sinners for rejecting it.
An Ohio woman sued a sperm after it mixed up donors and gave her the sperm of an African-American man instead of the white one that she and her partner had selected. She says the family is just trying to get compensation to deal with a situation that they weren't prepared to handle.
Jennifer Cramblett, 36, made headlines this week after she filed a law suit against the Chicago-area Midwest Sperm Bank for wrongful birth and breach of warranty. Cramblett told The Huffington Post in a phone interview that she and her partner, Amanda Zinkon, wanted their child to bear some resemblance to them -- particularly Zinkon, who would not be carrying the baby. After hours spent poring over sperm donor profiles, they found a donor with blond hair and blue eyes who looked like he shared heritage with Zinkon. But they didn't get the sperm they ordered.
Cramblett, who spoke with her lawyer present, said that while it’s true she and Zinkon didn’t plan on a mixed-race child, “I would never, ever take that away.”
“We love her -- she’s dream come true,” Cramblett said of her 2-year-old daughter, Payton. “For people to think I don’t want this child because of her skin tone is just not the case. It angers me that people would even think I don’t want my child.”
But because Payton isn't completely white, Cramblett said the family will have to move away from their current home in Uniontown, Ohio -- a place she described as white, conservative and too racially intolerant.
Free speech. The First Amendment to our Constitution.
Yet, it seems as if not all free speech is equally protected.
In the name of tolerance, only certainly speech is tolerated. If you are "pro" anything American, patriotic or religious, you are now labeled "intolerant" by a group that claims we must co-exist.
Want to fly the American Flag? Show your support for our military? Defend traditional marriage? Dare to wish someone a "blessed day? Then you need to be prepared to lose your job, be investigated by the IRS, get your page shut down by Facebook and be called some of the most nasty of names by those who tell us we must "co-exist."
Want to hold a Black Mass on a college Campus? Want to bring someone on campus convicted of murdering a police officer? Want to bring a terrorist to speak at your campus? That's all protected under the First Amendment according to the left.
The caveat is that we can only have a First Amendment and co-exist as long as we conform to what liberals say is okay.
The reality is that the left prefers that the right remain "speechless."
It is time to push back against the real enemies of free speech.
Katie O'Malley, Editor at Progressive Today, joins us today to talk about the dangers facing our First Amendment, along with how PC is taking our society on a downward trajectory.
SwCA Episode 166: I am used to having things MY WAY and I have NO PATIENCE when they aren’t. Help Me
SHOW NOTES: You are craving a new mountain to climb. This series, “SATISFACTION SATURATION™”, is for you. We will address the challenges in reaching the SATISFACTION SATURATION state in regards to specific experiences, how to recognize it, how to treat it, how to prevent it, and how to handle the feedback from other people (“Must be nice to have that job, that house, that car, that award,” etc.).
This specific episode is, “I Am Used To Having Things MY WAY and I Have NO PATIENCE When They Aren't. Help Me!"
Who are we after an extended time period of being catered to by others?
When we get used to having our needs and desires met (because we are the boss, the important client, the well paying supporter, etc.) it may result in us starting to believe that we deserve to be catered to and treated as a “special” person. We get used to having our meals served as we prefer and not having to wait in lines (because we are granted special access or we pay for extra convenience). Our ability to tolerate discomfort and to simply wait passively for attention is reduced. We start to think that any obstacle in our path is simply a temporary issue that with money or other resources will be removed from our life.
We know that we can often leverage our income and/ or power to make our lives easier. This is one of the primary reasons we made the sacrifices that we did to surpass our goals! We treat ourselves to our favorite experiences and why not? Yet, we are quick to anger and become frustrated when we hear that magic word that no human likes directed towards their request, “No.” We hear this word more rarely now (for some it is a faint memory from an earlier time that they try to forget