Celebrating ‘The Twilight Saga: New Moon’
In honor of the opening day of New Moon, the latest film in The Twilight Saga, we thought we ...
The Cheryl Behind the Cheryl
Known to many as the long-suffering (ex)wife of funnyman Larry David, the man behind Seinfeld, ...
BlogTalkRadio Host of the Week: Alfred McComber from...
By Christina Blodgett In our continuing effort to spotlight more members of the BlogTalkRadio ...
Dr. BFW
3/14/2008 3:46 PM UTC
Was Dr. Ball too busy revising his resume again? I would have enjoyed this more if we didn't have the denialist call in regurgitating talking points that are repeated over and over on the blogs and on youtube.
thetexastimes.com
12/18/2007 12:01 PM UTC
This is a very interesting and enjoyable program! The chat room stuff that was going on during the radio program was absolutely hilarious, too! Some guy kept dropping one-liners about how it was our duty to be poor and starve, to save the earth from CO2! :^D :^D :^D :^D :^D Is the chat room conversation archived along with the recorded radio program? ttyler5 a frequent sciguy commenter http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/
aaron_
12/18/2007 12:33 AM UTC
Where's Dr. Ball?
James Mayeau
12/17/2007 7:21 PM UTC
Thanks for doing this Dr Ball. Thank you Dr Dessler for presenting the challenge. And most of all thank you Eric for bringing it all together.
Jim Pacheco
12/17/2007 6:30 PM UTC
In my work, I deal with fish habitat models. I have 2 questions. 1) A model is basically math and physics attempting to describe the real world. My models are judged to be performing properly if the predicted values are close to acutal measured date. It is my understanding that all the models overpredict current year temperatures based on initial conditions and the co2 loading from a time in a previous decade. Why are these models still used to "prove" the co2-global warming conne
retiredphysicist
12/15/2007 2:38 AM UTC
Predictions of future global warming by CO2 are based entirely upon complex hydrodynamic computer simulations. From the little I know about these simulations, it appears that they have many fundamental weaknesses, in both the numerical gridding and the scientific equations. This raises doubts about the validity of the predictions. Here is a list of some of my concerns. My information may be out of date. I would appreciate your response. 1. Each numerical grid is apparently a few hundred miles i
You are not logged in. Please log in to write a comment.