Billy Black Actor Gil Birmingham: ‘Twilight’ Is...

We’d never thought of it this way, but Gil Birmingham may be right: The Twilight series ...

Steve Guttenberg to Director Dr. Ravi Godse: Gimme More...

Funnyman Steve Guttenberg’s plea for more screen time came a bit too late. But Movie ...

BTR Launches New Premium Feature: Host Your Show Using...

Starting this week, as a premium host on BlogTalkRadio you can host your show using Skype, ...

 

EPISODE NOTES    
Host Name: Eric Berger
Show Name:

A debate on the science of global warming


Date / Length: - 1 hr 30 min
Description:
Tags:

Comments

Dr. BFW

Dr. BFW

Was Dr. Ball too busy revising his resume again? I would have enjoyed this more if we didn't have the denialist call in regurgitating talking points that are repeated over and over on the blogs and on youtube.

thetexastimes.com

thetexastimes.com

This is a very interesting and enjoyable program! The chat room stuff that was going on during the radio program was absolutely hilarious, too! Some guy kept dropping one-liners about how it was our duty to be poor and starve, to save the earth from CO2! :^D :^D :^D :^D :^D Is the chat room conversation archived along with the recorded radio program? ttyler5 a frequent sciguy commenter http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/

aaron_

aaron_

Where's Dr. Ball?

James Mayeau

James Mayeau

Thanks for doing this Dr Ball. Thank you Dr Dessler for presenting the challenge. And most of all thank you Eric for bringing it all together.

Jim Pacheco

Jim Pacheco

In my work, I deal with fish habitat models. I have 2 questions. 1) A model is basically math and physics attempting to describe the real world. My models are judged to be performing properly if the predicted values are close to acutal measured date. It is my understanding that all the models overpredict current year temperatures based on initial conditions and the co2 loading from a time in a previous decade. Why are these models still used to "prove" the co2-global warming conne

retiredphysicist

retiredphysicist

Predictions of future global warming by CO2 are based entirely upon complex hydrodynamic computer simulations. From the little I know about these simulations, it appears that they have many fundamental weaknesses, in both the numerical gridding and the scientific equations. This raises doubts about the validity of the predictions. Here is a list of some of my concerns. My information may be out of date. I would appreciate your response. 1. Each numerical grid is apparently a few hundred miles i

Listeners

  • ROB STEVENS
  • theteenconservative
  • WingsWoman
  • Mountain Mother
  • Knowing True Islaam
  • cqpate
  • Tom Harris

Everything Else

Listen

 

Participate

 

Services and Terms

 

Corporate

 

BlogTalkRadio

 

© 2009 BlogTalkRadio.com. All Rights Reserved.