Show Notes

<a href="http://www.bannerfans.com"><img src="http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2834/16090198475.jpg" border="0" width="300" height="300" alt="Powered by BannerFans.com" /></a>

• Upcoming Episodes

  The Patriot Hour 79

  SIR MALACHI

  Date / Time: 11/23/2009 2:00 AM UTC

  Category: Current Events

  Call-in Number: (347) 324-3321

  <embed src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/BTRPlayer.swf?displayheight=&file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2fMALACHI%2fplay_list.xml?show_id=767811&autostart=false&shuffle=false&volume=80&corner=rounded&callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/FlashPlayerCallback.aspx&width=215&height=108" width="215" height="108" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" wmode="transparent" menu="false"></embed>
  

  WE ARE THE LEADERS IN UP TO THE MINUTE CURRENT EVENTS! IF YOU LIKE TRUE NEWS REPORTING LISTEN IN TO US! WE ARE CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENTS AND ARE READY TO FIGHT TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK!

  Upcoming Episodes

  11/26/2009 2:30 AM UTC - WEDNESDAYS WITH THE PATRIOT HOUR 46

  11/28/2009 2:30 AM UTC - MALACHI'S MENAGERIE OF HISTORY! PART 2

  11/30/2009 2:00 AM UTC - The Patriot Hour 80

• On Demand Episodes           14853          

  Date / Time: 5/31/2008 9:48 PM UTC

  WHITEWASHING THAI'S JIHAD!!!!

  In a story Wednesday on a jihadist attack on a wedding party and other jihad activity in Thailand, Agence France Presse added a concluding paragraph that was typical of mainstream media coverage of the Thai jihad and of jihad activity in general. For while AP, Reuters, AFP and the rest never saw a piece of Palestinian propaganda they didn’t like, they also never saw a jihad they couldn’t whitewash.

  AFP’s concluding paragraph blandly placed all the blame for the conflict on the non-Muslim Thai government:

  More than 3,000 people have been killed since separatist unrest broke out in January 2004 in the south, which was an autonomous Malay Muslim sultanate until mainly Buddhist Thailand annexed it in 1902, provoking decades of tension.

  All was well, you see, until the Buddhists of Thailand, motivated apparently only by rapacious imperialism, annexed the poor autonomous Malay Muslim Sultanate. AFP does not mention, of course, that the Malay Sultanate at that time was making war against the Siamese during the war between Siam and Burma, and Thailand conquered it in that context -- making it Thai by a right of conquest that has been universally recognized throughout human history (except, of course, when it comes to Israel and to any Muslim land that is conquered by non-Muslims).

  Along with this come the media’s allergy to the word “jihad,” and its frequent recourse to the passive voice when discussing what the jihadists did. Sometimes inanimate objects act, apparently of their own accord. For example, in a March story on bombings in southern Thailand, Reuters’ lead paragraph stated: “Bombs killed three men and wounded 21 people in three separate attacks in Thailand’s troubled Muslim far south, police said on Sunday.” Reuters gives no hint as to who is doing the bombing and who are the victims – which in itself is a clear indication that the bombers are not the government or pro-government vigilantes, but jihadists.

  The story continues in this vein. Its second paragraph tells us that a bomb was hidden in the car, but with no hint as to by whom. In paragraph 5 we learn that in the three southern provinces, “2,500 people have been killed in gun and bomb attacks since a separatist insurgency erupted in January 2004.” The separatist insurgency just erupted, you see, like a volcano. It was an act of God, a force of nature. Here again Reuters gives the reader no hint as to who the separatist insurgents are, or who killed the overwhelming majority of those 2,500 people. In paragraph 6, we learn how the “suspected militants” set off another bomb, but once again are given no hint as to who these militants are.

  Same thing in paragraph 7: unidentified “insurgents” ambush the security forces. In paragraph 8, it’s simply a “bomb,” a random, accidental object, that unaccountably wounded four people. But also in that paragraph we learn that this is all taking place in “the three far south provinces which formed an independent sultanate until annexed by Thailand a century ago.” Reuters and AFP are in step on this: the only background they give suggests that Thailand is entirely responsible for provoking the conflict, and should simply have left the Malay Muslims alone.

  Only in paragraph 10 of the Reuters story are we finally told that “Buddhist monks” are among the chief targets of the still-unidentified “militants” -- which should lead the informed reader to identify them as Islamic jihadists and Sharia supremacists. But they come to that identification with no help from Reuters.

  In reality, the Thai jihadists are uniquely brutal even by the standards of their jihadist brethren, and are fighting to correct the outrage, as they see it, of non-Muslim rule over a Muslim population in southern Thailand. But the AFP and Reuters stories exemplify the kind of coverage that jihad activity receives from the mainstream media as a matter of course. The perpetrators of jihad violence are not identified, their ideology is never discussed, and the conflicts they provoke are blamed on their victims. This kind of coverage is of a piece with the U.S. government’s new see-no-jihad, speak-no-jihad, hear-no-jihad policy: both appear to be based on wishful thinking. Both seem to emanate from the idea that if we simply do not allow ourselves to notice jihad activity, it will somehow fade away from neglect. If we pretend that Islam is peaceful, violent Muslims will lay down their arms.

  The price we will have to pay for these fantasies could be very high.
  • Tags:
  • POLITICS
  • GOVERNMENT
  • ISLAM
  • THAILAND
  • JIHAD
  No Comments

• Date / Time: 5/29/2008 2:26 AM UTC

  OLMERT'S LATEST PUSH FOR SURRENDER!!!!

  “You help me get out of the Hariri investigation, and I’ll help you get out of the corruption charges.” The Syrian and Israeli governments’ simultaneous announcing of their peace talks last week was timed with such transparent cynicism that the respective heads of state, Bashar Assad and Ehud Olmert, might as well have used that wording.

   

  Syria had just gotten a major boost with Hezbollah’s effective takeover of Lebanon in the Doha agreement, and now Israel was, moreover, anointing Assad as a peace-seeker. As for Olmert, his legal woes are mounting, and getting parts of the Israeli establishment to view him as a key to peace is a known way to extricate oneself from such woes.

   

  But whatever the blatant utility of its timing, the Syrian-Israeli announcement prompted a rash of writings on the prospects of a Golan-Heights-for-peace deal. The London-based Al-Quds Al-Arabi claimed on Saturday that Assad was caught between his foreign minister Walid Muallem, who supports a deal with Israel and a Syrian realignment with the West, and his deputy Farouk Sharaa who’s keen to remain aligned with Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas.

   

  Amir Taheri also wrote that the apparent warming toward Israel stemmed in part from Syrian fears of growing “Shiification” of the country by Iran, which has recently opened fourteen “cultural centers” in Syrian provinces.

   

  For Israeli Middle East maven Guy Bechor, all that wouldn’t matter because a peace deal would mean “Assad’s minority Alawite regime [would] be toppled” since “his regime has no legitimacy in Syria as it is, particularly when it comes to the [Sunni] Muslim Brothers, whose power keeps growing.”

   

  The upshot would be that “the Golan Heights would turn into a radical spearhead against Israel” with forces amassing there “from Iran, Afghanistan and elsewhere” and “life in the north [of Israel] turn[ing] into an unbearable nightmare” of terror attacks.

   

  Meanwhile the Bush administration was reported to be incensed at Israel with one official calling its announcement of the Syrian talks “a slap in the face.” The administration was right, of course, to criticize Olmert’s choosing as “peace partner” the thuggish Assad regime with its string of terror-assassinations in Lebanon, major facilitation of the Iraqi insurgency, and—seemingly most telling from Israel’s standpoint—recent abortive nuclear ambitions.

   

  Lost, though, is the fact that since adopting the cause of Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah terror organization, also as an alleged peace partner for Israel—even though, for instance, it gives Palestinian kids the identical education as Hamas—the Bush administration has been a major encourager of Israel’s own ongoing “peace” pathology of courting and rewarding terrorists and despots.

   

  Of the various points made about the hypothetical Israeli-Syrian deal, the most resonant concerned the asymmetry entailed: whereas Israel would be giving up something very tangible, the strategic Heights, Syria—an example par excellence of the volatile, fractious Arab Middle East—would be giving promises, promises, easily trampled and forgotten.

   

  Those of an empirical cast of mind would look at other Israeli peace deals as precedents. The wind blowing from Egypt, for instance, has been particularly cold lately—and not only because Egyptian Sinai continues to serve as a weapons conduit from Iran to Hamas.

   

  Earlier this month Egypt’s Culture Minister Farouk Hosni said he would “burn Israeli books himself” if they were found in Egyptian libraries. Last week an amateur Egyptian soccer team in Rome, which included Egyptian diplomats from the embassy there, decided to boycott an international tournament because it turned out it would have to play an Israeli team.

   

  The latest is that a group of elderly Egyptian-born Jews from Israel have had to cancel a visit to Egypt because this sparked a “frenzy” in the Egyptian media.

   

  And if one casts one’s empirical gaze toward Jordan, with which Israel signed a peace treaty in 1994, the situation isn’t much better. The Intelligence and Information Center gives examples of blood-curdling anti-Semitic material in the Jordanian press including the partly government-owned Al-Dustur.

   

  Israel didn’t, at least, make any significant land concessions to Jordan, and as Bechor points out, “the Sinai Peninsula is so large that the situation there is always reversible…. Yet with Syria the situation will be different: from an empty buffer zone, the Golan Heights will turn into a crowded anti-Israel region for generations to come.”

   

  The basic problem—one that neither Olmert nor Bush has the guts to look at—is that the Arab Middle East remains intensely hostile to Israel. That means keeping Israel both viable and a formidable, valuable U.S. ally requires strengthening it and not turning its remaining strategic assets into a clearance sale for hostile parties. At this late date, it’s a lesson still not learned.

  • Tags:
  • ISRAEL
  • OLMERT
  • SYRIA
  • GOLAN HEIGHTS
  • POLITICS
  No Comments

• Original Air Date: 5/25/2008 5:00 PM UTC

  THE PATRIOT HOUR!!!!

  GENERAL RACHEL AND I WILL BE DISCUSSING A LITTLE BIT OF EVERYTHING. SO JOIN US ON SUNDAY AT 1PM.
  <embed src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/BTRPlayer.swf?displayheight=&file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2fMALACHI%2fplay_list.xml?show_id=195390&autostart=false&shuffle=false&volume=80&corner=rounded&callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/FlashPlayerCallback.aspx&width=215&height=108" width="215" height="108" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" wmode="transparent" menu="false"></embed>
  • Tags:
  • AIDE
  • BIOLOGY
  • BORDER
  • CHIMERA
  • CONSERVATIVE
  Comments (1)

• Date / Time: 5/21/2008 2:16 AM UTC

  OBAMA'S MAMA!!!!

  Will Barack Throw Mama From the Train? [Update Two]

  By Larry JohnsoncloseAuthor: Larry Johnson Name: Larry Johnson
  Email: larry_johnson@earthlink.net
  Site: http://NoQuarterUSA.net
  About: Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm with expertise combating terrorism and investigating money laundering. Mr. Johnson works with US military commands in scripting terrorism exercises, briefs on terrorist trends, and conducts undercover investigations on counterfeiting, smuggling and money laundering. Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management. Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC's Nightline, NBC's Today Show, the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world, including the Center for Research and Strategic Studies at the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris, France. He represented the U.S. Government at the July 1996 OSCE Terrorism Conference in Vienna, Austria. From 1989 until October 1993, Larry Johnson served as a Deputy Director in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism. He managed crisis response operations for terrorist incidents throughout the world and he helped organize and direct the US Government’s debriefing of US citizens held in Kuwait and Iraq, which provided vital intelligence on Iraqi operations following the 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Mr. Johnson also participated in the investigation of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am 103. Under Mr. Johnson’s leadership the U.S. airlines and pilots agreed to match the US Government’s two million-dollar reward. From 1985 through September 1989 Mr. Johnson worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. During his distinguished career, he received training in paramilitary operations, worked in the Directorate of Operations, served in the CIA’s Operation’s Center, and established himself as a prolific analyst in the Directorate of Intelligence. In his final year with the CIA he received two Exceptional Performance Awards. Mr. Johnson is a member of the American Society for Industrial Security. He taught at The American University’s School of International Service (1979-1983) while working on a Ph.D. in political science. He has a M.S. degree in Community Development from the University of Missouri (1978), where he also received his B.S. degree in Sociology, graduating Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa in 1976.See Authors Posts (606) on May 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM in Barack Obama, Current Affairs, Michelle Obama

  COMMENTS ARE NOW CLOSED because we’ve surpassed 600 comments, BUT MAY BE VIEWED. CONTINUE YOUR DIALOGUES ABOVE.

  I now have it from two three four sources (three who are close to senior Republicans) that there is video dynamite–Michelle Obama railing against “whitey” at Jeremiah Wright’s church. Republicans may have a lousy record when it comes to the economy and the management of the war in Iraq, but they are hell on wheels when it comes to opposition research. Someone took the chance and started reviewing the recordings from services at Jeremiah Wright’s United Church of Christ. Holy smoke!! I am told there is a clip that is being held for the fall to drop at the appropriate time. The last thing Barack and Michelle need is a new clip that raises further questions about her judgment and temperament. Here’s what the Republicans are currently using in Tennessee:

  When the ugly video tapes about Jeremiah Wright’s racist ravings first broke Barack Obama told us he could no more disown Jeremiah Wright than his own Grandmother. Well, we all know how that turned out. So will Barack stand by Michelle when the tape emerges of her verbally attacking “whitey?” Republicans, who are otherwise gloomy about prospects in November, recognize that this recording will create real problems for Barack and give them a shot at the White House. It is their October surprise.

  Does Barack have an obligation to tell the Democrats, super delegates in particular, about this tape? Did Barack and his campaign do their basic homework and identify this tape as a potential problem? And, more importantly, do they have a copy? Probably better to deal with this issue before the convention rather than wait for October. What do you think?

  • Tags:
  • POLITCS
  • MICHELLE
  • OBAMA
  • BARACK
  • CURRENT AFFAIRS
  No Comments

• Original Air Date: 5/18/2008 5:00 PM UTC

  THE PATRIOT HOUR!!!!

  WE WILL BE COVERING A VARIETY OF TOPICS. SO TUNE IN ON SUNDAY MAY 18th 2008 at 1PM EDT.HOPE TO HEAR YOU THERE.
  <embed src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/BTRPlayer.swf?displayheight=&file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2fMALACHI%2fplay_list.xml?show_id=195389&autostart=false&shuffle=false&volume=80&corner=rounded&callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/FlashPlayerCallback.aspx&width=215&height=108" width="215" height="108" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" wmode="transparent" menu="false"></embed>
  • Tags:
  • CONSERVATIVE
  • POLITICS
  • BLOG
  • TALK
  • RADIO
  Comments (1)

• Date / Time: 5/17/2008 3:05 PM UTC

  AN EARLY OCTOBER SURPRISE

  An Early October Surprise

  by JR Dieckmann

  Is it any coincidence that in this year of 2008 we face perhaps the most important presidential elections in our history, and in the same year, a doubling of gas prices has occurred? It would be a stretch of the imagination, or as Mrs. Clinton would say - “a suspension of disbelief” to believe that these two issues are not connected.

  Do you remember back in 2004, there was a lot of talk about a George Soros “October surprise” which was intended to collapse the stock market and bring down the economy just before the election? This disaster, had it happened, would all have been blamed on George W. Bush and his tax cuts, to benefit the Democrats in the November election. Soros himself is quoted as saying he would give his entire fortune if it would ensure the defeat of Bush. It is not just Bush whom Soros opposes, but any Republican in the White House that he cannot manipulate to advance his own liberal-socialist agenda.

  During the 2004 election cycle, Soros gave $3 million to the Center for American Progress and $5 million to MoveOn.org. Another $10 million of Soros money went to America Coming Together. Millions more were funneled through Soros’ activist groups masquerading as “charity organizations,” which ended up in pro-Democrat campaigns. After the reelection of George W. Bush, Soros and other rich liberals backed a new fundraising group called Democracy Alliance whose purpose is to support the goals of the Democrat party. In all, Soros spent $25 million in his attempt to cause the defeat of George W. Bush.

  Soros has also used his millions to fund such things as James Hanson, the NASA scientist who espoused the threat of global warming. Through his Open Society Institute, Soros funded Hanson’s legal and media assistance to get him on TV talk shows to promote the global warming fraud. Soros money was also used in the 2006 illegal alien protest demonstrations in Los Angeles and across the country where Mexicans carried Mexican flags and demanded citizens rights for illegals.

  Soros has also helped to fund the defense of terrorists in U.S. courts and lawsuits opposing terrorist surveillance laws to protect the country from terrorism. But I don’t have to tell you that George Soros has a history of siding with CAIR and the ACLU. He will side with anyone who is opposed to conservative American values.

  Soros is well experienced in manipulating currency and commodity markets for financial and political gain. In 1992, Soros used his Quantum Fund in a speculative maneuver to break the Bank of England, forcing it to devaluate the English pound which profited Soros $1 billion at the expense of hard working British citizens.

  In 1997, Soros was branded an “economic war criminal” by Thailand, and the Malaysian Prime Minister blamed him for their economic collapse. Soros also invested billions into the collapse of the Soviet Empire through illegal, insider purchases of Sidanko Oil and the siphoning of $100 billion out of the country.

  Soros had his greedy fingers in the economy of France too. Caught in a scheme of illegal insider trading, Soros was charged and convicted in his attempt to takeover the Société Gereralé bank. His conviction was upheld in two separate appeals as recently as 2006, however he got off with a mere $2.9 million fine.

  There is probably no one more qualified and experienced at manipulating the economies of nations than George Soros. So what do you do if you’re George Soros and you failed to gain political success from the tens (or perhaps hundreds) of millions of dollars you have invested into the Democrat party? You try again. In 2004, Soros was unable to crash the stock market to get John Kerry elected so he changed his strategy to plan for 2008.

  We like to blame OPEC for the high cost of gas today; in fact it is the oil speculators in the commodity futures market that are the cause of those prices. The oil producers of OPEC are only too happy to take the obscene profits that the speculators have made possible. But without the little regulated practice of futures trading, oil would still be selling for less than $50 a barrel today.

  In a 2005 article, Mike Norman of the Fox News Channel said “The New York Mercantile Exchange is the preeminent energy futures market in the world. It has become the price-setting mechanism for oil. Even OPEC refers to NYMEX when it sets its price targets. Right now it costs exactly $3,375 for anyone to control 1000 barrels of crude oil valued at roughly $67,000. Three grand to control nearly seventy!“ That was in 2005 when oil was selling for $67 a barrel.

  What Norman is saying is that in the Commodities market, an investor may buy oil futures by putting up only 5% of the purchase price. It’s hard to understand why this is the case with oil, while most other futures investments require 50% of the purchase money up front. Norman says it is because NYMEX makes a lot of money off of these oil investments listed on its exchange.

  I’m not expert in futures investments, but as I understand it, these are basically short term investments. What happens is that an investor, or group of investors, will buy up blocks of oil with a mere 5% deposit, then start bidding them up against each other, causing the price to rise. It’s sort of like a game of poker limited only by what price the retail market will bear. This tells the oil producers like OPEC what their product can sell for, and they are only too happy to reap the profits - along with the speculators. But this practice can be dangerous to our nation’s economy, and George Soros understands that. He couldn’t wreck the economy through the stock market in 2004, but he can launch a successful attack by using oil.

  In 2005, Soros began dissolving his investments in oil production and moving that money into oil distribution while investing heavily in the oil futures market. Using his hedge funds, Soros and other like minded investors have bid up the price of oil to now over $120 a barrel. Other investors followed, and continue to follow his lead to cash in on the profits. As long as he can use his political influence to keep supplies down, Soros profits and the American people suffer the consequences. His political influence is most effective as long as he can convince enough people of the threat of global warming and that burning fossil fuel is the cause of it. The partnership of Soros and Gore is a match made in hell.

  But futures speculation is a gamble. If the selling price does not go up, the investor can lose money. Soros is rarely wrong on his speculations. And by using his financial influence he has the power to exercise control over the supply. The demand for oil is always going to go up so, it’s just a matter of keeping the supply down to assure a huge profit. Soros’ speculation becomes a self fulfilling prophecy and the price goes up. At the same time, he is investing heavily in alternate energy industries, so either way, he comes out a financial and political winner.

  Soros knows that with increasing oil costs, the costs of most everything else will also increase. The Bush administration was not helpful when they decided to grant “stimulus” handouts from the federal treasury. This has the net result of devaluating the dollar, making all of the money that you and I have worth less. It’s sort of like a stock split.

  Say you own 10 shares of IBM worth about $800. The stock splits and now suddenly you have 20 shares of IBM. But each share is now worth only half as much, so your net gain is zero and your investment is still worth $800. In U.S. currency, you may have more dollars, thanks to the Bush handouts, but your buying power is reduced because everything you buy now costs more.

  That pittance of $300 or $600 doesn’t begin to compensate for the value you have lost in the other money or holdings you have, your entire fortune, whatever it may be, is now worth less than it was a year ago. The value of the U.S. economy hasn’t gone up, it is just being represented by more paper money. If you had $10,000 in the bank last year, well, now it’s worth only about $9,000 in buying power. This election year political trick to endear you to your favorite politician will do almost nothing to improve the economy, but only serves to hurt you in the long run.

  As the dollar becomes worth less, and the cost of living goes even higher, the country goes into recession and financial problems start spreading like the plague. The public becomes dissatisfied and unhappy, and the Democrats blame Bush and the Republicans for the recession, in hopes of getting Democrats elected. Few people can, or will, explain how George Soros, the financial backer of the Democrat party caused all of this with his oil futures manipulation. It’s easier just to buy into the blame Bush snow job.

  But just ask anyone who thinks Bush is responsible for the high gas prices, how he could have caused this. They will usually tell you that he is doing it to help his oil buddies. But how is he doing it? The president is not a dictator and has little power over the free market or the price of oil. He can’t make it go up and he can’t make it go down. Only the oil speculators can do that. The president can try to persuade the crude oil producers around the world to produce more oil to help balance the supply and demand, but that is about all he can do as long as Congress refuses to consider increasing domestic supplies.

  Soros is highly motivated to disrupt the oil supply for more than just political reasons. He is investing heavily in alternate energy and farming industries such as Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland who are active in the harvest of corn for ethanol. Soros is not only using his financial influence to promote the liberal-socialist agenda, but is also attacking the entire economy of the United States through his manipulation of the oil market, to assure a Democrat victory in November.

  He wasn’t able to pull it off by using the stock market in 2004 - now it looks like he is finding success in the oil market, and this time he means business. And he will get away with it too, if people don’t wise up and realize what is going on. We can’t stop the oil price tampering without changing the laws, and we can’t do that as long as Democrats rule the Congress. When you hear Democrat politicians and candidates start using the failing economy as a campaign issue, you need to understand who is really behind it.

  But it’s nothing new for Democrats to create a problem and then blame it on Republicans. Were it not for their ability to tell convincing lies, that political party would no longer exist. The reality is - we have no one to blame for the price of gas and our current economic woes but George Soros and the Democrats he keeps in his hip pocket. No need to wait for an October surprise, it’s already happening. But if I’m correct, then we can expect gas prices to go down after the election.

  Related Reading

  Wikipedia: George Soros, Quantum Group of Funds, Soros Partners
  Investors Business Daily: The Soros Threat To Democracy
  GuruFocus.com: George Soros Sells Oil Producers, Buys Oil Distributors,
  GuruFocus.com: Soros Crystal Ball
  FoxNews.com: The Danger of Speculation
  Newsmax.com: Is Soros Planning 'October Surprise' for Bush?
  AmericanThinker.com: George Soros and the Alchemy of 'Regime Change'

  • Tags:
  • POLITICS
  • CONSERVATIVE
  • NEWS
  • SOROS
  • ELECTION
  No Comments

• Date / Time: 5/11/2008 1:14 PM UTC

  THE PATRIOT HOUR-SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION!!!!

  LISTEN IN ON MAY 18, 2008 AT 1PM EDT. WHERE EVERYTHING COULD BURST INTO FLAMES!!!! THAT'S WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN WHEN MALACHI AND GENERAL RACHEL GET TOGETHER!
  
  • Tags:
  • AIDE
  • BIOLOGY
  • BORDER
  • CHIMERA
  • CONSERVATIVE
  No Comments

• < Previous Episodes