Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

The Dred Scott case and the 14th Amendment: Fact vs. Fiction

  • Broadcast in Politics
  • 0 comments
Moorish Science Radio

Moorish Science Radio

×  

Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow Moorish Science Radio.
h:440453
s:7800069
archived

On this episode of Moorish Science Radio, we will completely debunk all of the misinformation swirling around the Dred Scott case and 14th amendment. We will discuss:

  • Was Justice Taney's decision that stated that Dred Scott (or any so-called "negro") had "No Rights Which the White Man was Bound to Respect" an actual fact?
  • Was Justice Taney's decision an actual law?
  • Was this ruling ever overturned?
  • What did the dissenting justices have to say about the decision?

We will debunk the myth of the 14th amendment as espoused by conspiracy theorist and Moors who are confederate sympathizers. We will teach on:

  • What did Prophet Noble Drew Ali mean when he stated that the 14th and 15th amendment was not necessary for our salvation?
  • Was the 14th amendment properly ratified or not? Debunking the conspiracy theorists.
  • Is there a such thing as a 14th amendment citizen?
  • Did the 14th amendment redefine humans as persons and was this designation solely given to corporations?

We will teach on these topics and several others. All of the myths surrounding the Dred Scott case and the 14th amendment will be debunked on this show. SPREAD THE WORD!

Comments

 comments