MOORISH MYTH BUSTING: Using the Moroccan Treaty as an argument in law.

Join us on this episode of MOORISH SCIENCE RADIO where we will be debunking the frivilous theory that the treaty between the Moroccan Sultan and the U.S.A and also treaties made with the Sultan and the United Kingdom, can in fact be used as an argument in law. There is a contingency of paperwork selling Moors who pushing the false notion that the Moors should not deal with the Moorish Science Temple of America and that they should be dealing with the treaty because somehow, dealing with the treaty is dealing with real Islam and a host of other fallacious arguments.

Points will include:

• Are Moors effectively using any of these treaties and what proof can be shown in the affirmative?
• Is there any precedence besides the 1790 Sundry Act where ANY Moor has effectively used the treaty as a succesful argument in law?
• Was the treaty ever invoked in the Moors Sundry trial?
• How can Moors claim that they are not U.S. citizens but try to invoke the treaty between Morocco and the U.S?
• How can Moors claim that they are not U.S. citizens and try to use the U.S. constitution as an argument?

All of this and more will be touched on in this episode. It is time to put an end to all frivilous arguments surrounding this Moorish movement by brothers and sisters who have to keep these arguments going to sell their nationality packages. We offer to any of the treaty pushing paperwork Moors to call into the show and have a respectful dialog in this regard.