Why Obama Refuses to Defend Marriage: Marxist Theology v. Natural Law

Broadcast in Current Events

Call in to speak with the host

(424) 222-5202

h:174417
s:1594239
archived
kellyoconnell

kellyoconnell

×  

Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow kellyoconnell.
Today's show is on Obama & Defense of Marriage Act and his refusal to defend marriage. Obama just announced he will not defend DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, designed to block gay marriage legalization. Barack stated the reason—because it is “unconstitutional.” But is it any coincidence Marxist doctrine teaches marriage is a subset of the state; whereas our Founder’s Natural Law only countenances heterosexual unions? By stating he will not honor legally passed statutes, Obama openly rejects the rule of law. He has pushed the presidency from a defender of our laws into being its destroyer. The reason is that, despite any disagreement Barack has with particular pieces of legislation, he swore an oath to defend the whole Constitution. If he were to challenge this law in a law-abiding manner, this would at least respect our institutions. But to simply declare a particular law “illegal,” is certain to sow future chaos and an antinomian spirit into our Republic.

Comments

 comments