Programming Highlights; March 15, 2010
Tune in to some great content from today on BlogTalkRadio. *Please note that all show times ...
Programming Highlights; March 14, 2010
Programming Highlights; March 13, 2010
http://freeicanbe.info/speak.out.now
Country: United States
Language: English
Follow on Twitter
Visit on Facebook
Visit on MySpace
Visit on Ning
Add to Friends
Send Message
Change begins with me. "The end of silence is this…light, life, laughter, liberty… oppression will not stand an end of silence." Janeen DeGolier Noetling (1953-?) For those of you who like My Mama's Mustache, listen for it approximately 10 AM (give or take a couple of minutes)following up a 30 minute broadcast on the broad topic of incest and incest family systems. This new format is necessary due to time and circumstance constraints.
The recipe for changing a life is simple; it is rarely easy. For myself, it seemed a slow trudge to nowhere. after years of silent suffering from childhood trauma (incest) recovery seemed a far reach for me.
The main ingredient was the getting up each morning and putting one foot before the other; like a broken record, I got sick of it. I did it anyway.
Now I am here, free of the load and fully vocal.
Date / Time: 8/24/2009 1:30 PM UTC
I keep thinking I will get this show organizwd better and every week the family I was raised in finds another means of attack. Tar and feathering can only be a heartbeat away. LOL
Groupthink is a type of thought exhibited by group members who try to minimize conflict and reach consensus without critically testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas. Individual creativity, uniqueness, and independent thinking are lost in the pursuit of group cohesiveness, as are the advantages of reasonable balance in choice and thought that might normally be obtained by making decisions as a group.[1] During groupthink, members of the group avoid promoting viewpoints outside the comfort zone of consensus thinking. A variety of motives for this may exist such as a desire to avoid being seen as foolish, or a desire to avoid embarrassing or angering other members of the group. Groupthink may cause groups to make hasty, irrational decisions, where individual doubts are set aside, for fear of upsetting the group’s balance. The term is frequently used pejoratively, with hindsight.
William H. Whyte coined the term in 1952, in Fortune magazine:
Groupthink being a coinage—and, admittedly, a loaded one—a working definition is in order. We are not talking about mere instinctive conformity—it is, after all, a perennial failing of mankind. What we are talking about is a rationalized conformity—an open, articulate philosophy which holds that group values are not only expedient but right and good as well.[2] Symptoms of groupthink To make groupthink testable, Irving Janis devised eight symptoms indicative of groupthink (1977). Illusions of invulnerability creating excessive optimism and encouraging risk taking. Rationalising warnings that might challenge the group's assumptions. Unquestioned belief in the morality of the group, causing members to ignore the consequences of their actions. Stereotyping those who are opposed to the group as weak, evil, biased, spiteful, disfigured, impotent, or stupid. Direct pressure to conform placed on any member who questions the group, couched in terms of "disloyalty". Self censorship of ideas that deviate from the apparent group consensus. Illusions of unanimity among group members, silence is viewed as agreement. Mindguards — self-appointed members who shield the group from dissenting information. Groupthink, resulting from the symptoms listed above, results in defective decision making. That is, consensus-driven decisions are the result of the following practices of groupthinking[5] Incomplete survey of alternatives Incomplete survey of objectives Failure to examine risks of preferred choice Failure to reevaluate previously rejected alternatives Poor information search Selection bias in collecting information Failure to work out contingency plans.
Groupthink being a coinage—and, admittedly, a loaded one—a working definition is in order. We are not talking about mere instinctive conformity—it is, after all, a perennial failing of mankind. What we are talking about is a rationalized conformity—an open, articulate philosophy which holds that group values are not only expedient but right and good as well.[2]
To make groupthink testable, Irving Janis devised eight symptoms indicative of groupthink (1977).
Groupthink, resulting from the symptoms listed above, results in defective decision making. That is, consensus-driven decisions are the result of the following practices of groupthinking[5]
You are not logged in. Please log in to write a comment.