Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

Judge's Ruling without any law[s] on the books

  • Broadcast in Politics
  • 0 comments
Lets Talk Politics wXTerry Virgil

Lets Talk Politics wXTerry Virgil

×  

Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow Lets Talk Politics wXTerry Virgil.
h:374343
s:7906943
archived

Why is it okay for Obama the Liberals, and the rest of the democrats well in this case the Communist have the right to violate the law[s] and Kim Davis cannot do any civil disobedience and seeing that there is no law[s] showing in either the United States Construction or the State of Kentucky that states it is okay for same-sex marriage that can be even cited?  

The State law in Kentucky does state a marriage is to be between just one man and one woman only. There is no law[s] in the united States Constitution that states it is legal for a same-sex marriage. This law is one the books and is very constitutional 1 U.S.C. A. § 7 or known as DOMA. 

Let me cite Obama here  “President Obama's decision not to defend DOMA" is based on the very Liberal idea that anythigng goes. http://campus.westlaw.com.lib.kaplan.edu/result/previewcontroller.aspx?TF=756&TC=4&mt=CampusLaw&db=1142&ordoc=2028227528&caseserial=2028227528&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&findtype=1&spa=004042837-2000&serialnum=0377627421&vr=2.0&fn=_top&sv=Split&pbc=BC6E23F9&casecite=133+S.Ct.+2884&rs=WLW14.04&RP=/find/default.wl&bLinkViewer=true

The Liberals, Democrats would liek to use the U.S.Const. amend. XIV  

 

Comments

 comments