Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

Judge's Ruling without any law[s] on the books

  • Broadcast in Politics
Lets Talk Politics wXTerry Virgil

Lets Talk Politics wXTerry Virgil


Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow Lets Talk Politics wXTerry Virgil.

Why is it okay for Obama the Liberals, and the rest of the democrats well in this case the Communist have the right to violate the law[s] and Kim Davis cannot do any civil disobedience and seeing that there is no law[s] showing in either the United States Construction or the State of Kentucky that states it is okay for same-sex marriage that can be even cited?  

The State law in Kentucky does state a marriage is to be between just one man and one woman only. There is no law[s] in the united States Constitution that states it is legal for a same-sex marriage. This law is one the books and is very constitutional 1 U.S.C. A. § 7 or known as DOMA. 

Let me cite Obama here  “President Obama's decision not to defend DOMA" is based on the very Liberal idea that anythigng goes. http://campus.westlaw.com.lib.kaplan.edu/result/previewcontroller.aspx?TF=756&TC=4&mt=CampusLaw&db=1142&ordoc=2028227528&caseserial=2028227528&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&findtype=1&spa=004042837-2000&serialnum=0377627421&vr=2.0&fn=_top&sv=Split&pbc=BC6E23F9&casecite=133+S.Ct.+2884&rs=WLW14.04&RP=/find/default.wl&bLinkViewer=true

The Liberals, Democrats would liek to use the U.S.Const. amend. XIV