Fightin Words

The Politics of Force: Violence & Government

by Fightin Words

Airdate:

Call in to speak with the host

h:90522
s:969257
archived
No matter how animated political and social commentators get, they typically offer the claim they are "non-violent," and stress to their audiences the importance of peaceful civic action. Terrorism is generally defined to be the use of violence to affect political change, and clearly carries a negative connotation. The underlying message of these trends would seem to be, "Violence is not a valid tool for affecting political or social change." However, this flies in the face of both a plain view of history (American Revolution, anyone?) and our contemporary reality. Government may be described in one word as "force." Government is an agent of violence. Government is there to coerce behavior under penalty of fine, imprisonment, great bodily harm, or death. That is all it can do, its sole capacity. That we condone the existence of government suggests we do, in fact, condone the use of violence to affect both political and social change. So, the question becomes, not whether it is okay to be violent, but when. In Fightin Words return to BlogTalkRadio, we shall address this intriguing introspective question in relation to the First American Revolution, and its modern statist counterpart, the Progessive movement.
Tags:
Progressive,
Libertarian,
Violence,
Terrorism,
Revoltuion
 comments

Learn More Create and Share Get Support Follow Us
BlogTalkRadio is the easiest way to create and share audio on the web.

cinchcast
© 2012 BlogTalkRadio.com. All Rights Reserved.     Privacy Policy Terms of Use Revenue Sharing
Help