Connect to your account and we’ll send your message to Twitter.
Twitter Account: Not authorized (update)
Celebrating ‘The Twilight Saga: New Moon’
In honor of the opening day of New Moon, the latest film in The Twilight Saga, we thought we ...
The Cheryl Behind the Cheryl
Known to many as the long-suffering (ex)wife of funnyman Larry David, the man behind Seinfeld, ...
BlogTalkRadio Host of the Week: Alfred McComber from...
By Christina Blodgett In our continuing effort to spotlight more members of the BlogTalkRadio ...
http://www.blogspot.com
Country: United States
Language: English
Add to Friends
Send Message
Drama Hour
4/3/2008 2:50 PM UTC
THANKS FOR ALL THE LOVE COME CHECK US OUT AT BLOGTALKRADIO.COM/DRAMAHOUR
LipService
1/18/2008 2:26 PM UTC
LIPSERVICE.... we promise you will have a blast....Join us Tuesdays and Wednesday at 11PM Eastern Time and 8pm Pacific 347-215-7737
Our Perspective
1/2/2008 4:34 AM UTC
Thank you VERY much for coming through and showing your support! Happy New Year! We hope and pray your New Year is positive and productive! Sincerely, Bro. Hank & T'Boogz!!
PPC1
12/24/2007 8:02 PM UTC
KEEP STANDING UP PEOPLE FOR OUR KIDS TOMORROW PEOPLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Knowing True Islaam
12/24/2007 5:39 PM UTC
Visit Knowing True Islaam
You are not logged in. Please log in to write a comment.
Hello, I am Eileen Left. Join me for TAILS & CONSPIRACY. BannerBreak.com - Banner Maker - Banners - MySpace Layouts {"width":"300px"}
Eileen Left
Date / Time: 3/14/2008 3:00 PM UTC
Category: War
Author Mark Pickering talks about his interviews with war veterans and the difficulties they have when they return from war. In his book 'Story on the Sand' he tells the story of a fictious character. Although the book may be fiction, it is definatly based on reality.
Date / Time: 9/25/2008 2:17 AM UTC
By LAURIE KELLMAN – 3 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Bowing to President Bush's demands, the House passed a mammoth package for the Pentagon on Wednesday that contains a pay raise for troops, billions of dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — and some political protection for lawmakers during a tense election season.
The 392-39 vote sent the $612 billion defense authorization bill to the Senate, which was expected to clear it this week.
To earn President Bush's signature rather than a veto, House and Senate negotiators dropped several provisions he opposed. They include a ban on private interrogators in U.S. military detention facilities and what would have amounted to congressional veto power over a security pact with Iraq.
Not passing it before Congress adjourns this week was not an option six weeks out from an election in which voters will choose a new president, every seat in the House and a third of the Senate. Democrats made clear early on that any Republican efforts to block the bill would be characterized as disrespect for military personnel.
However, negotiators address objections from some Senate Republicans to $5 billion in pet projects not requested by Bush, called earmarks. In the compromise, the earmarks are listed in a table accompanying the legislation.
"We're very thankful to have a chance to get the bill passed," said Rep. Todd Aiken, R-Mo.
A separate bill would have to be passed to spend the money cleared by the authorization bill.
The measure would permit $612.5 billion in spending for national defense programs in 2009, including $68.6 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also includes a 3.9 percent pay increase for military personnel, half a percentage point more than Bush requested.
The $612 billion military authorization bill would also fully fund the request for a radar site in the Czech Republic, opening the door for the next U.S. administration to begin building a European missile defense system. That project has been a serious source of tension in the deteriorating relationship between the United States and Russia. Moscow opposes the deployment of U.S. military assets so close to its borders.
On Iraq policy, the package requires the Pentagon to report to Congress on the details of certain military agreements between the U.S. and Iraq. It also requires the Pentagon to enumerate Iraq-related items in its budget request.
For military personnel, the legislation provides the raise and extends certain bonuses. It authorizes $3.2 billion for new family housing, tuition assistance and training opportunities for military spouses. Additionally, it permits $25 billion for health care programs and blocks the president's plan to raise certain medical user fees and deductibles.
It boosts oversight of contracts, requiring a database of defense contractors that have broken the law.
The measure does not contain any statement calling for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq.
Election-season politics shadowed the debate and helped dislodge the measure from objections in the Senate.
Several Senate Republicans objected to the bill because they oppose earmarks, but they relented after one of their own drummed up enough support for the bill to clear a test tally.
Retiring Sen. John Warner, R-Va., a former chairman of the Armed Services Committee, implored his colleagues to vote for the bill out of respect for military personnel.
An earlier version of the bill eventually passed the Senate, 88-8.
The measure is S. 3001 as amended.
Date / Time: 9/24/2008 12:07 AM UTC
QUESTION?
I have been thinking about the two campaigns and this is something that I noticed.
If you grow up in Hawaii , raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic, different." Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers and shooting wolves from a helicopter, a quintessential American story. If you are named after your father, Barack, you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim. Name your kids Willow, Bristol , Trig, and Track, you're a maverick. Graduate from Columbia College and Harvard Law School and you are unstable. Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded. If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real leadership experience. If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people,20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest ranking executive. If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real Christian. If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian. If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society. If, while mayor, you charged rape victims for the cost of their rape kits, and while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant, you're to be admired. If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community,then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't represent America 's. If your husband is nicknamed "First Dude", with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA , your family is extremely admirable.
To me the choice is clear. It is about the Past vs. the Future. I am tired of living in the past. It is time to look to the future.
Eileen
Original Air Date: 9/22/2008 3:30 PM UTC
Date / Time: 9/22/2008 3:08 PM UTC
Date / Time: 9/19/2008 1:42 AM UTC
It is impossible to understand the global economy unless we appreciate the background to the world money system. This is not taught in the schools and no smart suited economist or correspondent on the television news will tell you the truth either. Some of them don't know what is going on because they have been programmed to believe nonsense by the education system, while others simply don't want you to know.
The foundations of the manipulation toward a world government, army, bank and currency are built on the fantastic con trick we call the banking system. Once people understand the way this works, it is easy to see how a few can control the lives of everyone else.
The banks are given the power to 'create' money, by which they mean 'creating' non-existent money known as credit. This cost them nothing, but the moment this credit is brought into theoretical existence the banks can start to charge interest on it. This is the system that controls everyone's life. But it goes further then that. When you take out a loan, the bank 'creates' credit for the size of the loan, say $20,000. If only in theory, that is 'new' money. But your are not going to pay back only $20,000, because you have to pay interest on that loan. The interest has not been 'created' by the bank, but it still has to be found from somewhere. So where? From the wealth and credit already circulating in the world.
In this way, since this crazy banking system began, the real wealth of the planet has been sucked into the banking system as the interest paid on every loan to every person, business, and government. This has allowed them to lend even more non existent money on the back of that and get the world even deeper in-debt. The wealth and credit loaning capacity they have accumulated is beyond comprehension, far more than that of the United States, the richest country in the world. In fact, they own the United States, as they own almost every other country in the world. The bankers have used this wealth and credit mountain to buy and control the global oil companies, multinationals of every kind, the media, the armament companies, the drug companies, the politicians, the political 'adviser's', and virtually everything else they need to control the world. The same few people and families own the lot! They hide this truth behind the front organizations, the desire for secrecy by the pathetic media and the education system. The Rockefeller's and Rothschild's alone control a fantastic network of banks, oil companies, multinational corporations, airlines and scores of others organizations.
The Rockefeller/Rothschild Chase Manhattan Bank has enough power by itself to stimulate a global financial panic. We could be seeing that happening now with the current banking problems.
By controlling the creation of credit, the bankers can cause booms and busts, nationally and internationally, whenever they wish to further their ambitions. An economic depression is not caused by a collapse in the demand for goods and services. People do not decide that they no longer want jobs done or articles produced. An economic depression is caused when there are not enough pieces of paper and electronic 'money' in circulation to pay for those goods and services. And who controls the amount of money-credit in circulation? The banks. If they want to cause a depression for ulterior motives, as in pre-war Germany and the US, they take measures which reduce the amount of money in circulation. They reduce the number of loans they make and raise interest rates. Currently, banks are very cautious about lending money to other banks. Our banks are having to go to other countries to borrow money.
This also reaps a colossal reward for the major (Global Elite) banks. People still have to pay the interest on loans taken out before the manufactured economic collapse and if they default, the banks take their property and increase by hundred's of thousands the number of farms, businesses, and homes they own. And with every payment of interest by those who continue to pay their loans during a depression, more money is being taken out of circulation and not recycled back into the economy, thus increasing the depression.
This process of reducing money in circulation and causing a depression can be seen all the time. The economists and their poodles, the politicians and economic correspondents, call all this part of the 'economic cycle'. Bull Crap! In the 1930's that terrible depression, in which men, women , and children starved in a world of plenty, was caused by the banks withdrawing money from circulation by refusing loans. It wasn't that people didn't want to eat; they simply could not afford to buy the food because money had been artifically taken out of circulation. I will leave it to an 'insider' to sum up the situation I have described. Rober H. Hemphill, a credit manager at the Fedreal Reserve Bank in Atlanta, said:
"This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollare we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks creat ample synthetic money we are prosperous, if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless postition is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most improtant subject intelligent persons can investigate and relect upon. It is so important that our present civilisation may collapse, unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon."- Sheldon Emery, "Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People" - Spotlight newspaper reprint, (February 3rd 1986) p8. this article was sasummary of Emery's book of the same name.
There was no money, people were told, to build houses and feed the population. But suddenly, when it was time for the Golbal Elite's war, the money available to finance Hitler, Japan, and the war effort in the United States and Great Britain was limitless. People often say that there always seems to be money available to fight wars. Of course there is, because the bankers who control the world economic system want those wars. They do not want people well-housed with full bellies and a proper education because then they would be much harder to control. It was not the much hyped 'New Deal' policies of Franklin Roosevelt which ended the 30's depression, it was the banks putting money back into circulation to finance the war they were creating. Here is a reality of life on Earth:
There is no need for anyone to be cold, hungry, homeless or in poverty. All these things are casued by the lack of pieces of paper and electronic numbers called money circulation in the world and by the charging of interst on them. We could change that today if the diesire was there.
Original Air Date: 9/8/2008 3:00 PM UTC
Date / Time: 9/8/2008 1:51 PM UTC
< Previous Episodes
BannerBreak.com - Banner Maker - Banners - MySpace Layouts