THE NEW VILLAGE RADIO  

Show Notes

• Archived Blog Post

  Date / Time: 1/22/2009 9:01 AM UTC

  Anarchy Or Tyranny: The Most Pertinent Question Of Our Age
  

  Some months ago, I happened upon a website called `Anarchismo`. Like the title suggests, it's subject matter is `Anarchism`. Now like with most people, the very word brings forth images of men in `Top Hat and Tails`, throwing small grenades and the like sometime around the turn of the Twentieth Century. But having almost exhausted my interest in what I was already aware of, I decided to have a read. `Shock and Horror`, I was surprised to discover that there was much that appealed to me therein. At the top of the page I found this statement;

   

  "Anarchists believe in a revolution by the working class which will overthrow the bosses and their governments, and create a society run and controlled by those who actually produce the wealth of the world. We believe that it is possible to live without government and to put in its place councils and assemblies where the "ordinary people" can decide what happens to this wealth. We believe in the equality of all and that maximum solidarity is needed between workers and other oppressed groups if we are to defeat those who live off our sweat".

   

  So, how different is the above statement in sentiment to that of Icke's some paragraphs previous. Not very I would suggest. So is David Icke an Anarchist? Well, on the face of it, I would venture to say that he is, of a sort at least. What's more, so am I then. There are some idealogical differences and the emphasis on the `collective` can create certain reservations, and yet a more comprehensive look at their written material clearly distances them, the Anarchists, from all the various forms of Marxism. In effect, they are striving for a society without Bosses. A society where ordinary people work together in concensus, without any form of authoritarianism at all. Handing back, or rather taking back responsibilty for their own lives, to live as they themselves want to live. This is very similar to what Icke proposes and what I have come to believe is the only chance humanity has to save itself from slavery. Overthrow the rulers. Deconstruct all the symbols and `fortresses` of government. Destroy centralisation, and dethrown what has become the very instrument of tyranny, `Legislation` and the legislators. The idea of the `Collective` is a good one and a fair one, and providing it is protected from the abuse of those who would restore `order`, then it might possibly be our last best chance for freedom.

   

  Going back to our small group here in Denmark, there are those with grave doubts about our aligning ourselves with the `A'chists`, as images of `mad bombers` persist, even though all evidence is to the contrary. Having spent some weeks reading various essays on the subject, I will summarise my own impressions in the following Paragraphs.

   

  The Quest For A Free Society and World?

   

   

  "When we read or hear about Anarchists, we are led to believe that they are mad bombers. The myth is perpetuated that they believe in violence for the sake of it. The other myth is that Anarchism is chaos. This idea is propagated by politicians, bosses and their `puppets`in the media, stating that if there was no government there would be chaos. But did you ever wonder about society today and come to the conclusion that perhaps we are already living in chaos?" Anarchismo

  We who are familiar with researching the machinations of the Illuminati and their `fellow travellers` are more than aware of what the aims of our `manipulators` are. But so it seems are the Anarchists, who spell it out clearly. They say it more bluntly and perhaps more simplistically than we do, but they have identified at least one major aspect of the Agenda; PROFIT! And why not put it simply. If we want to get the message across to people generally this is what we need to do, and the Anarchists understand this. They realise that at the moment we live in a society in which there are two major classes - the bosses and the workers. The bosses own the factories, banks, shops, etc. The Workers don't. The only resource people have to bargain with is their labour, with which they make their living. Workers are compelled to sell their Labour to the boss for a wage. The boss is interested in squeezing as much work out of the worker for as little remuneration as possible so that he/she can maintain high profits. Thus the more wages workers get the less profits the bosses make. Their interests are in total opposition to each other. Production is not based on the needs of ordinary people. Production is for profit. Therefore although there is enough food in the world to feed everyone, people starve because profits come first. This is called Capitalism.

  The State

   

   

  For the needs of people and the workers to be fully met, the Anarchists maintain that we must get rid of the bosses. But this is no easy task. The bosses are organised. They have the media, the police, the army and the courts on their side. In effect, they have the full support of the State, and all the resources that go with it. We are of speaking about the merger of State and Corporate interests here, ie. Corporatism, or as Mussolini put it; "FASCISM". 

  The State (i.e. governments, armies, courts, police, etc.) is a direct result of the fact that we live in a class society. A world where the 225 richest people have a combined wealth equal to the combined annual income of the world's 2.5 billion poorest people.

  The state is there to protect the interests of this minority, if not by persuasion then by force. Laws are made not to protect us but to protect those who own the property. 

  The Lie That Is Democracy

   

   

   

  People in the west (and especially so here in Scandinavia) have bought into the lie that the state is run in our interests. There are elections to ensure that any government not behaving itself can be brought to task? But of course, in truth, their democracy is about ticking boxes. We are given a choice all right, but between parties who all agree with the system of a tiny minority ruling the country. Check how many of the leading politicians from whichever political party in your country, are members of either the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commision, Council For Foreign Relations or one of the plethora of similar organisations all dedicated to the Globalist Agenda. Again, the Anarchists are in complete agreement. They can see how `Electioneering` inevitably leads to people forsaking their principles. These `political` men and women, perhaps initially of good intention, go along with whatever is popular and ensures they are elected. This becomes more important to them, than any idealogical motive. It also means that they look on the mass of voters as mere spectators. People are seen as voters, not as people who can be actually involved in politics and bringing real positive change about. But as I have written above, in the west, the populations, lured by the promise of instant credit have just handed over all political responsibility to those who would enslave them.

  Real Freedom and political responsibility cannot come through Parliamentary means. The Anarchsmo Website explains "If we look at a country like Chile we can see why. In 1973 the people elected a moderate socialist government led by President Allende. This democratically elected government was toppled by a CIA backed military coup. Repression followed in which the workers movement was smashed and thousands of militants lost their lives". 

  Central to the Anarchist is the belief that it is the people who must make the revolution. In other words, take back responsibilty for their own lives. Every member of the working class (workers, unemployed, housewives, etc.) has a role to play. Only by this participation can it be ensured that Anarchism is made real. They believe in a revolution that comes from the bottom up, and is based on factory and community councils. They maintain that Freedom cannot be given, it has to be taken. As each week passes, and nothing changes. As the New World Order becomes more of a reality, I have to agree with them. I cannot see how intellectual dissemination of the `truth` alone will prevent our `prison` becoming a reality within the next decade.

   

  Not Marxists, Anarchists

   

   

  Anarchists disagree with what is called the "revolutionary left", who still hold to the belief that a Political Party is necessary to make the revolution for the people. Marxist Socialists base their ideas on Marx and Lenin who believed that workers were only capable of achieving what they called "trade union consciousness". Both believed that a party of professional revolutionaries was essential to make the revolution for the people. What happened in Russia was nothing to do with true socialism. Power remained in the hands of a tiny party elite. The state was the boss and the workers were still exploited and told what to do. Most familiar with the activities of `The Rothschilds` and Wall Street around the time of the October Revolution will be aware that the so called `Socialist Revolution` was financed by the very same people who were the supposed `arch enemies` of Communism, namely the Capitalsts of Wall Street and The City Of London. 

  Making The New Society

   

   

  The Anarchists therefore maintain that it is up to ordinary people to create the `New Society`. The question begs to be asked; "Would it not be chaotic?" Who knows? But what would you call our current world situation. The Freemasonic Motto `Out Of Chaos Order` is being well applied by the `puppet masters` at present, as our world decends into their manipulated economic chaos. This is clearly designed to provoke the people into demanding `something must be done`, and then they can implement their ready and waiting planned response. As things stand at the moment, Capitalism would collapse without the support of the working class, who produce everything, and therefore all the wealth. Like Icke, I agree as do the Anarchists that it is possible to organise production so that the needs of all are met. It is also possible to create structures that allow everyone to participate in making the decisions that affect them.

   

  Anarchists propose that Society would be based on factory and community councils. These would liase or `federate` with each other so that decisions could be made covering large areas. Delegates could be sent from each area and workplace. They would be accountable and `recallable`. With the new technology now available, it would be much easier to involve people in the decision making process. Within such a society there would be genuine individual freedom. Individuals would have to contribute to society but would be free to the extent that they do not interfere with the freedom of others. Fundamentally Anarchists believe that people are good and if they won freedom would not easily give it up or destroy it.

  Avoiding Previous Mistakes

   

   

  History is not neutral. What we learn in school is what is necessary for the perpetuation of government, rulers and capitalism. So called education is one of the major means by which we are controlled, indoctrinated and deceived. What they do not teach us though is that throughout history, it has been shown that organised government is not necessary. People are not inherently bad. Given the right conditions a spirit of mutual aid and co-operation can and will grow. The lessons of our past shows us that Anarchist ideas can work. A new society can be forged with ordinary people in control (the frontier pioneers in the US did very well without government). The Anglo Saxon Tythings were devoid of heirarchical `government` save the `Warlord` who was impotent without concensus, and the early English communities operated by such concensus for almost a century and a half.

   

  But such a society won't happen spontaneously. It must be planned, built and created. - We must organise for it. Still, many in our small group here in Denmark cling to the belief that sometime soon, a great awakening will occur amongst the people. This awakening, will then as if by magic grow into a worldwide movement for peace and love and that a whole new ideal will be born out of it. David Icke most certainly has believed in and propagated this idea for almost twenty years. Icke is a visionary. A great man, and one of the finest writers in his field. But he not only has been proved to be wrong in this assertion, he is being proved wrong right now as as I write, the Illuminati `Golden Boy` is being sworn in as the 44th President of the United States. He will vow to uphold the constitution in front of Billions of people, knowing full well that he has no intention of doing so.

   

  There will be no spontaneous awakening. That is why the Anarchists maintain and I have to agree with them, that we need revolutionary organisation. An organisation that draws together all those fighting for freedom and an end to tyranny. An organisation that gives us the chance to exchange ideas, experiences, and to learn from the lessons of history. An organisation that facilitates our struggle together for a new society. An organisation that sets aside petty differences and pseudo intellectual ideologies and as Henry Makow put's it, "Focuses on what we have in common".

   

  We do not need more`leaders` and their passive followers. We do need an organisation working towards mobilising the masses of ordinary people in the process of making the `revolution`. I conclude this call for people to revolt, peacefully yet assertively, against the machinery erected and fortified ever more each day to enslave them, with a paragraph from the `RAK` (Anarchists Copenhagen) site which I feel explains very well how a fair and free society could and should be constructed;

   

  "An anarchic society is in our opinion, overall, a socially organized community of free people without state capitalism, hierarchies and privileges. This community will be based on decentralized organization and consensus decisions. This organization is our declared goal. To achieve this goal we will use the funds and methods available which are consistent with our position. Activism is not in itself enough to create an anarchic society. It is important that we come together in our common WANT and NEED, rather thatn what we share idealogically. It is very important that members share this view and make no distinction between individuals based on their ethnicity, gender, etc. and or ther personal lifestyle orientation,religion, diet, etc.. The RAK (Anarchists Copenhagen).

  • Tags:
  • PART 2 OF MARTIAL LA
  • Permalink