Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

CCP 425.17(c) commercial speech exemption writ v. appeal explained

  • Broadcast in Legal
AttorneySteve

AttorneySteve

×  

Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow AttorneySteve.
h:154860
s:9512427
archived

Anti-SLAPP law overview - appealing an adverse ruling on CCP 425.17 "commercial speech exemption."  In this episode of Vondran Legal Hour "Attorney Steve" explains the difference between a WRIT and an APPEAL.  An appeal may be taken as a matter of right unless the judge denied the motion on grounds that commercial speech was at issue.  In those circumstances, filing a "writ" or petition to review the lower court ruling is the avenue to pursue per case law.  Keep in mind, most writs (approximately 90%) are summarily denied as they can result in piecemeal litigaiton and "cut in line" for cases properly up on appeal.  So there has to be really good grounds to file a writ or they will be denied (i.e. they are "discretionary").

For more information about California litigation, arbitration and mediation in business, real estate, software, and intellectual property law go to our law firm website at www.VondranLegal.com.  If you need legal representation, contact us at (877) 276-5084.

Facebook comments

Available when logged-in to Facebook and if Targeting Cookies are enabled