Connect to your account and we’ll send your message to Twitter.
Twitter Account: Not authorized (update)
Celebrating ‘The Twilight Saga: New Moon’
In honor of the opening day of New Moon, the latest film in The Twilight Saga, we thought we ...
The Cheryl Behind the Cheryl
Known to many as the long-suffering (ex)wife of funnyman Larry David, the man behind Seinfeld, ...
BlogTalkRadio Host of the Week: Alfred McComber from...
By Christina Blodgett In our continuing effort to spotlight more members of the BlogTalkRadio ...
http://www.artbulla.com/zion.html
Country: United States
Language: English
Follow on Twitter
Visit on Facebook
Visit on MySpace
Add to Friends
Send Message
Dedicated to the redemption of Zion. Revelations of Jesus Christ, authority, Priesthood, Kingdom of God, doctrine discusssed pertaining to the salvation of Ephraim and Manessah. (Being in Baja in Mexico, and there are no services here, I have to use Skype via a satellite connection which cause drop-offs. But the show is well worth your time, despite this unavoidable problem due to latency (satellite 22,000 mi above earth and packets scatter at times))
Date / Time: 10/10/2009 6:18 PM UTC
Pond-scum-to-people evolution teaches that, over time, by natural causes, nonliving chemicals gave rise to a living cell. Then, this single-celled life-form gave rise to more advanced life-forms. In essence, over millions of years, increases in information caused by mutations plus natural selection developed all the life forms we see on Earth today.
For molecules-to-man evolution to happen, there needs to be a gain in new information within the organism’s genetic material. For instance, for a single-celled organism, such as an ameba, to evolve into something like a cow, new information (not random base pairs, but complex and ordered DNA) would need to develop over time that would code for ears, lungs, brain, legs, etc.
If an ameba were to make a change like this, the DNA would need to mutate new information. (Currently, an ameba has limited genetic information, such as the information for protoplasm.) This increase of new information would need to continue in order for a heart, kidneys, etc. to develop. If a DNA strand gets larger due to a mutation, but the sequence doesn’t code for anything (e.g., it doesn’t contain information for working lungs, heart, etc.), then the amount of DNA added is useless and would be more of a hindrance than a help.
There have been a few arguable cases of information-gaining mutations, but for evolution to be true, there would need to be billions of them. The fact is, we don’t observe this in nature, but rather, we see the opposite—organisms losing information. Organisms are changing, but the change is in the wrong direction! How can losses of information add up to a gain? (from Answersingenesis.com)
You are not logged in. Please log in to write a comment.