Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

Heretics in Church Hijack the Same with their Private Interpretation

  • Broadcast in Religion
Art Bulla

Art Bulla


Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow Art Bulla.

Wicked cultural Mormons, who are apostate, are erecting the black flag of piracy over the Church, claiming the heresy of dispirate "private interpretations" while wresting the teachings of Joseph and Brigham, falsely claiming these as "ideas" (otherwise spoken of by the term "private interpretation"):

 20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.  (2 Pet  1:20-21)

But Mr. Hale, the chief of these agnostics (know-nothings), attributes the term "ideas" or a private interpretation to that which was spoken by Brigham and Joseph as moved upon by the Holy Ghost, thus denying and blaspheming against the Holy Ghost:

10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.
11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.
12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;  (2 Pet 2:10-22)

The Gospel of salvation is perfectly calculated to cause division. It strikes at the root of the very existence of mankind in their wickedness, evil designs, passions, and wicked calculations. There is no evil among the human family, but at the foundation of which it strikes effectually, and comes in contact with every evil passion that rises in the heart of man. It is opposed to every evil practice of men, and consequently it disturbs them in the wicked courses they are pursuing.  (Journal of Discourses, 26 vols., 1:, p.235)?