Virtue of Selfishness - Individualism  

Show Notes

• On Demand Episodes           24442          

  Date / Time: 12/28/2008 9:26 PM UTC

  DICTATOR OBAMA, LAST AMERICAN PRESIDENT, TO TAKE OATH ON ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S BIBLE

  As unbelievable as it seems, our beloved America has been raped, disgraced, violated, and handed to the people who hate her most.  The most horrible realizations of the daily tragedy we are experiencing are the perpetrators of this unthinkable crime are the very people who hold sacred positions of the highest public trust.  I often lose sleep trying to understand why judges, Senators, Congressmen, politicians and the 9 snakes of the Supreme Court would betray us they way they have.  Do they think they are so powerful they are immune from accountability and ultimately penalty? Have they given up on the principles and laws of our Great Constitution? Are they so jaded they truly consider Obama so great he is above the law? Why did they do this to America? Why, why, why I have asked the great silence repeatedly since last July?
  
  There is no doubt that in some way some how if this issue over Obama's eligibility isn't resolved to the satisfaction of the rule of law of the Constitution, there will be more than just riots if the election were to be overturned on behalf of our constitutional law.  In spite of the multiple law suits demanding proof of his eligibility to be president under the law of the land, Obama ruthlessly allows this single issue to fester and grow, waste millions of dollars in legal fees and judicial costs, and is willing permit violence and bloodshed that is certain to happen sooner or later. He also is willing and knowing to permit the final destruction to the Constitution so as to become world dictator.  All the people mentioned in Ted's above article are guilty of participating in the same unbelievable evil plot.
  
  It seems to me that the strategy of Obama and his conspirators is to be sworn into office on January 20, 2009.  Immediately take control of the White House and the government with his strategically named cabinet and appointees. Then he will take over the military, declare martial law, declare the US Constitution obsolete and end the Republic of the United States.  With just a little more manipulation, he will change his title from President to some other political title that will in essence mean "DICTATOR".  D I C T A T O R     O B A M A.  What army do the American people have to defend them?  Who and what has enough money, military might, patriotic conviction, experience, or fearlessness to stop this?  If this seems like a fantasy of a delusional old lady, then think.  Look how far Obama has gotten already.  WE are only 23 days from his CORONATION.  Are there any signs Obama will not be swearing the oath on Abraham Lincoln's Bible, no less!
  
  
  
  • Tags:
  • Obama
  • Abraham Lincoln
  • Bible
  • Usurper
  • constitution
  No Comments

• Date / Time: 12/27/2008 6:17 AM UTC

  No Violent Response When Saved From The Harm of Fraud. What If?

  NO VIOLENT RESPONSE WHEN SAVED FROM THE HARM OF FRAUD. WHAT IF

  What if you went to the grocery store and chose a large box of crackers needed to go with your family’s dinner only to discover upon opening the package it only contained rat poison.  How would you react?  First you would immediately know that isn’t what you intended to buy. Your choice was crackers.  You got rat poison in its place. Then you wonder how it happened that rat poisoning was inside a beautifully packaged box labeled crackers. Would feel deceived?  Would you wonder if it was an accident or all the boxes contained rat poison?  Then you would realize you didn’t get what you needed for the family.  That means you will have to make a second trip to the store and return the rat poison and look for the right box that truly has crackers and not some other unwanted product.  What if every beautifully designed box labeled crackers had any thing else in it but crackers. What if he refused to refund your money and told you to keep the rat poison whether or not you needed it?  Then he said you really didn’t need the crackers, anyhow. What if the store keeper told you this is because it is now bringing you change and a new way of doing business?  What if when you objected, the store keeper advised you to keep silent about the way the products were packaged because he didn’t want others to get upset? Or he simply said, “Get over it.  This is the new way we are doing business. It is the customers will.”  Would you begin to lose confidence in a store that offered only beautifully designed packages that did not contain the items that were stated on the labels.  Would you continue doing business with that store?  What if all stores started doing business that way?  Or worse—what if there were no other stores but that store?

   

  Why is it then, so difficult to understand the argument Obama worshipers present that Obama is the will of the people because he allegedly received 66,000,000 votes is false?  Why is it people have such a difficult time recognizing that the Obama they thought they were choosing is not the Obama they are getting. That is the price of fraud. What voters thought they were choosing and what it actually was are no different than picking a box of crackers based upon the label on the box to only later discover it was rat poison.  That is why 66,000,000 Obama votes are not the will of the people.

   

  Who turns violent against the person or system that saves him and his family from egregious harm? That is why there will be minimum to no rioting if some branch of the electoral process takes the responsibility, declares Barry Sotoero ineligible to be President on the basis he is a usurper and over turns this election.  The worst that will happen after the initial trauma is voters will be grateful Obama was discovered before he could do any more harm to America. Except for the very large group of Obama conspirators who are amoral, most of the voters will feel very betrayed by the man who so flagrantly abused their trust and stole their vote. Only the Saul Alinsky pirates of political power are using the threat of violent riots by the people if the silver plated turd is prevented from becoming a usurper.  They are the ones who will be facing their just dues.

   

  Let us all use the power of our imaginations and see Congress, the Nine Supreme Court Judges, and people doing the right thing by preventing a usurper from being President.

   

  2009 promises to by a year of challenges, surprises, and increased participation.  May your greatest inspiration of efforts come forward.  May we share the benefit of your genius. Have a Happy and Powerful New Year!

  www.museumofinnocence.blogspot.com

  www.blogtalkradio.com/vos

   

  • Tags:
  • riots
  • violence
  • Obama
  • Usurper
  • Saul Alinsky
  No Comments

• Original Air Date: 12/22/2008 3:00 AM UTC

  Defend our Constitution

  What can we do to have standing as "We the People"?. Has the Supreme court let us down, again? What are the choices...
  <embed src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/BTRPlayer.swf?displayheight=&file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2fVOS%2fplay_list.xml?show_id=363949&autostart=false&shuffle=false&volume=80&corner=rounded&callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/FlashPlayerCallback.aspx&width=215&height=108" width="215" height="108" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" wmode="transparent" menu="false"></embed>
  • Tags:
  • obama
  • birth certificate
  • supreme court
  Comments (2)

• Original Air Date: 12/15/2008 3:00 AM UTC

  Will the Supreme Court uphold the constitution

  Topic is: Blagojevich and the Obama Senate Seat Sale Scandal Plus - In what constitutes one of the most sublimely ridiculous pills the American people are expected to swallow, we're being told that Obama has produced his birth certificate when, in fact, he has—and still is—actively resisted producing his birth certificate.
  <embed src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/BTRPlayer.swf?displayheight=&file=http://www.blogtalkradio.com%2fVOS%2fplay_list.xml?show_id=357898&autostart=false&shuffle=false&volume=80&corner=rounded&callback=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/FlashPlayerCallback.aspx&width=215&height=108" width="215" height="108" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" wmode="transparent" menu="false"></embed>
  • Tags:
  • Obama
  • citizen
  • supreme court
  • birth certificate
  • dual citizenship
  No Comments

• Date / Time: 12/14/2008 9:32 AM UTC

  The Nature of Government

  " A government is an institution that holds the exclusive power to enforce certain rules of social conduct in a given geographical area.
  Do men need such an institution -- and why?" Ayn Rand The Virtue of Selfishness
  
  I'm not a Bible scholar, but remember in Samuel how the people of Israel had decided that they must have a king. The logic behind their decision was: "All our neighbors have kings." Never mind that God had been their King all along, but God didn't say no, and he called on Samuel to annoint Saul for the people insist on having a king.
  
  Samuel, and every prophet who came after him, held a very low opinion of human kings. Samuel resisted the very idea on the ground that the people of God were under the care and keeping of their heavenly king. Their king was the God who had created them, the God who had set them apart to be the People of God. A human king would be redundant. Copyright © 2008 The Episcopal Church - Sermons that work
  
  But, in the end, the people prevailed. Samuel anointed a man named Saul whom the people chose to lead them. Samuel had been told by God to choose Saul, but Samuel had them cast lots anyway, believing that God would sovereignly control the lot. The lot finally fell on Saul. Saul's first qualification from the voters' perspective was that he was tall; he stood head and shoulders taller than everyone else, he had been successful in battle. No mention was made of his governing skills, except by Samuel; and no one was listening to Samuel. Saul was, quite simply, the man of the moment.
  
  Yet in a few years he had lost his contact with God, lost the anointing of the Spirit, lost his humility, lost his character, lost his kingdom and lost everything. We can follow all the human kings, some good, some great, some with tragic results. The folly of man being governed by man however, is still with us today, and I'm not suggesting we could live well without government.
  
  I'm not an anarchist suggesting we try to rule ourselves and expect that everyone will just stay out of each others way. No, we are social creatures who benefit by living in cooperation with one another, and in a world of irrational and godless men, we may be wise to rely not only on our "man of the moment", but on our God and King.
  
  Our founding fathers were not anarchists either. They were however, revolutionary traitors to a government that sought to control the people of the land, not only in social matters, but in their private and religious matters as well. The first settlers weren't revolutionaries. Remember, they came to put some distance between themselves and their Government. The new world offered space to create new societies in which they could worship without interference—like the Pilgrims and Puritans who founded New England.
  
  Some who were considered troublemakers and radicals in their homelands, like the liberals fleeing the failed European revolutions of 1848, America offered the opportunity to make a new life in a land that valued liberty. To others, like Cuban revolutionary José Martí, the United States provided a temporary refuge while they worked to free their homelands from colonial rule or tyrannical governments. Source: Destination America by Charles A. Wills
  
  The point is we are a country that was built on the promise, on the dream, on the hope that we are a people who control our own government, and our government was designed to serve the people. Not to feed them and clothe them and tell them how to live their lives. Not to protect them from themselves or tax them out of fairness [welfare] or punishment [vice tax]. Taxes should be collected only to fund the basics of the government and the areas that we've contracted the government to handle, like a standing army and safe air traffic.
  
  I fear very much that we as a nation, as a people have allowed the government to become something of a behemoth that needs to be restricted and tamed back into submission.
  • Tags:
  • Government
  • Ayn Rand
  • Objectivist
  No Comments

• Date / Time: 12/13/2008 7:22 PM UTC

  WHY 66,000,000 OBAMA VOTES IS NOT THE WILL OF THE PE0PLE

  Why 66,000,000 Obama Votes Are Not the Will of People

  One of the most common arguments presented by Obamabots why the people who are challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President should not do so is because 66,000,000 people voted for Obama.  Therefore choice for Obama is the will of the people.  Wrong, wrong, wrong and 66,000,000 votes wrong. Only half of America voted.  Only half of the half who voted, voted for whom they thought was Obama.  That makes the number only 25% of the people who thought they voted for Obama. That  is hardly the will of the people.  The candidate for whom 66,000,000 people voted, was not the candidate they thought he was.

  1.      First of all Obama’s true legal name is Barry Sotoero.  If Obama’s real name is Barry Sotoero, the people voted for Barack Hussein Obama and not Barry Sotoero.  Barack Obama doesn’t exist except by his fictional creation.

  2.      If Obama knowing he failed to meet one of the three criteria to become president, then he is knowingly a false candidate. False means not real.  Not real means fiction.  The people voted for a fictional candidate and not a bonafide qualified real candidate.  They voted for a fictional character.

  3.      If Obama was “change you could believe in”, then the people voted for their belief in change not to get short changed.

  4.      If Obama is MSM favorite and MSM suppressed vital information necessary for the public choice and reported only favorable information about Obama, then the people voted for Obama media hype, not the favorite.

  5.      If Obama is a flim/flam man, the people voted for the flim/flam and not the man. The man is an illusion.

  6.      If Obama is an empty suit, they voted for the suit and not the empty.

  7.      If Obama is “the one”, they voted for a fantasy and not the man.

  8.      If Obama is one slick glittering package, they voted for the package and not the slick.

  9.      If Obama is a silver plated turd, they voted for the silver plating and not the turd.

  If Obama is not qualified under the US Constitution to be President, then he perjured himself and perpetrated a heinous fraud upon the American people.  All those people who voted in good faith for him have been betrayed.  The reality is that had MSM been objective in their reporting about Obama and disclosed the question of his eligibility based upon his citizenship, perhaps 66,000,000 would have voted differently.  Because Obama, the DNC, MSM, and a few thousand more deliberately covered up the truth, published a forged COLB, chances are very good there is a USURPER about to steal the government and place America in the greatest NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT in her history.  
  

  
  

  Under no circumstances can Obamabots claim because 66,000,000 who voted for what they thought was a valid candidate these votes represent the will of the people. Again, had the voters known the real facts, the question is would they have voted for him. It cannot be called the will of the people when the people who voted had voted based upon false information.

  The fat lady hasn’t sung yet. The more you discover the more power you gain. Join the discussion at www.blogtalkradio.com/vos Sunday 12-14-08 from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. PST.  How will Blag’s arrest affect the rest of the Obama thugs?

  Check out this video regarding the electoral college

  Cut and paste – it’s excellent

  http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/video/video/show?id=2482704%3AVideo%3A13154

   

   

  • Tags:
  • Obama votes
  • not so
  • people's will
  • 
  No Comments

• Date / Time: 12/13/2008 5:34 AM UTC

  Understanding BHO and the influence of Chicago Politics

  I'm sure you were all surprised over the recent events surrounding the Governor of Illinois. I must say, I wasn't surprised by the charges or allegations of corruption, I was surprised that the FBI was on top of the situation and acted on the evidence at hand. I hope it wasn't too premature to implicate all that need to be implicated.
  
  Perhaps because the allegations show such blatant disregard for the legal political process or perhaps because of the widespread nature of the corruption...they seemed to act with some urgency. Secretly, I'm hoping that many in the new administration may be implicated and that the Golden Boy may become a bit tarnished if not downright taken down. How disrespectful, huh? I just believe very strongly that our president-elect is very much involved in, has been tutored in, that same political machine.
  
  When I watched the Obama biography that ran during the campaign days, one of the things that sounded "out of tune" to me (that's my personal thermometer), was the stark difference between the young Obama and the Harvard and Political Obama. As a child and well into his early college days, he was an islander. Hawaii, Indonesia and southern California have a lot in common. I'm Dutch-Indonesian myself, and I can tell you that I live in southern California because we're from the islands. When my parents first left Indonesia they were not allowed to immigrate to America. We had to immigrate to Holland first, as they were Dutch citizens. My parents only lasted 5 years in the Netherlands. Partly, the socialism, partly the weather. Indonesians like the ocean and the balmy breezes. If there was a warmer beach, that's where you'll find the Indonesian immigrants. Those of my family who immigrated to Chicago or Ohio in the 50's, found their way to southern California.
  
  So, this laid-back islander, comes to southern California for college, Occidental, I believe and retains his laissez-faire and laid-back life of mediocrity as a citizen and college student. It happens to a lot of southern California college students. The weather, the beach, the drugs, it's easy to understand mediocrity. But then...something happened. They don't really say what happened in the Bio, but the young Obama somehow has an epiphany and transfers to Columbia. Does anyone know if that's easy or hard to do? I have 5 kids, some of who had college aspirations and college is expensive. If they were students with middle class parents, then it became even harder to pay for college without the parents becoming involved. There's this thing called Expected Family Contribution that's factored in.
  
  Okay, so let's say he comes out of Occidental without debts and transfers to Columbia with a tuition and expenses of at least $30K per year, since I don't know what the inflation factor here is... but these are the costs of Columbia today.
  
  Average Cost at Columbia, 2008-2009
  Tuition $37,470
  Mandatory Fees $1,856
  Orientation & Transcript Fee (new students only) $480
  Room & Board $9,980
  Books & Personal Expenses $2,100
  Average Cost of Attendance $51,886
  
  Scholarships for mediocre students is a tough sell. Financial need grants and loans, Pell Grants, Stafford loans I understand, but what kind of scholarships? We know they weren't merit scholarships, because he describes his time at Occidental as mediocre and unfocused. Okay, so let's say, he gets out of Columbia with no debt... In 1983 he graduates from Columbia University and works a year at Business Int'l Corporation. Business International Corporation, as far as I can research, was a publishing and advisory firm dedicated to assisting American companies in operating abroad. That makes sense, especially if he trades on his Indonesia and Kenyan connections, but the Bio doesn't go into that or his time at the firm.
  
  The first "out of tune", "sour note" or flag came with the next step in his college life. In 1985 he moves to Chicago and talks someone into hiring him as the director of the Developing Communities Project. His first boss thought it odd for a young man of 24 wanted to be a community planner, but hired him and he stayed there for 3 years.
  
  Why Chicago?
  
  What happened in Los Angeles to send him to Columbia, and what happened at Columbia or at Business International Corporation that would make Chicago the next logical move. He had no family in Chicago, no obvious ties or relations. A young college grad, probably in debt from college, or maybe not at all, ...but a college grad with a year of experience in the corp world, and voila...."I think I want to work in an underpaid, community service job in Chicago"? Call me crazy, but what makes an islander choose Chicago? Isn't there as much community service opportunity in Hawaii or Los Angeles? He couldn't have gone there only for the experience in community service projects. Chicago streets are tough, and there's nothing that he could have found appealing as an islander. The islands breed a laissez-faire attitude of live and let live. I think it comes from the fact that if one part of the island isn't to your liking you find another and it's free and public and everyone is well fed and happy, with or without a job or a purpose. Especially in Indonesia where food and good weather is more abundant than money and jobs. You don't need money to have a good day in Indonesia. The locals aren't very materialistic and just enjoy good company and good days, one person, one day at a time. Where did the drive, the desire, the need to understand and succeed in Chicago politics come from?
  
  I personally struggle with various natures in myself. My physical and spiritual, my Indonesian islander and my conqueror Dutch. At home we laugh about our "Dutch-Indo" culture. The Indonesian in me just wants to basque in the sun and suck on mangoes all day -- the Dutch in me wants to buy up all the mangoes and sell em to tourists. I tend to do a little of both, not ever giving in completely to either.
  
  I wonder then, what this Islander, no more mixed culture then I am, struggles with? He isn't Kenyan, he's not Indonesian or Hawaiian or midwestern. He's not white and he's not black. He's managed to become an crusader for race, poverty, social and economic justice issues with no real roots in either. Perhaps that's where his elitist demeanor comes from. In many cultures the whitest or the lightest are revered. I know that sounds racist, but in colonial Dutch Indonesia it was not unusual for those with lighter skin to be thought more beautiful. In Asian countries you'll find the movie stars and news anchors tend to have a lot of western features. It's just an observation of mine, it's not a racist statement, y'all. My grand kids bring even more mixed culture to our family, and there aren't a group of more beautiful kids on the planet....okay! I'm only observing and opining here.
  
  I believe BHO was on a mission, a continuing education mission. I do believe he's the trojan horse. I don't think that any islander can really make POTUS a mission for his own purposes. He doesn't really want to have a foreign policy, or conflicts in the world. He doesn't really want to have to prove himself. He's a skater who's smart and wants to be at the top of his game, but believe me this is just a game still. I believe he'd be a happy camper sucking mangoes on some island. I think he took a personal journey, was discovered to be unique, and was then mentored and groomed to be who he is today. (Not that anyone knows what that is.....yet), but somewhere he accepted in himself and others saw in him, not the greatness that some want to believe, but the uniqueness of floating to the top and the ability to win favor.
  
  I believe he was TOLD to go to Chicago, to learn about the proletariat issues and learn how to succeed in Chicago politics. It required he work in community service, it required he go back to school for a law degree. It required he marry a black woman and become part of the Chicago machine.
  
  But why, and who is behind this? From where does he get his inspiration? We know it isn't the bible...he's mocked much. I doubt if it's the Koran, a real muslim knows the consequences of being worse than an infidel. But what then?
  • Tags:
  • Obama
  • Charlatan
  • usurper
  No Comments

• < Previous Episodes