Registration is easy. You'll be able to add favorites, message hosts and other listeners, and download shows in no time. Please complete the information below.
All fields are required.
You can post this most recent episode player to virtually any blog or web site.
Copy and Paste the embed code below:
You can post this most recent multi-episode player to virtually any blog or website.
Oh, Snaps! Pauly and Marky Hang with Richard Simmons
How do Pauly and Marky find the time to sleep, or eat even - let alone do their ever-popular ...
‘The Dish’ Host Danielle Fishel: Mariah Carey’s a...
In the end, Danielle Fishel didn’t have to fish long for a deserving fashion ...
Kristin Chenoweth: I’d Love to Play Glinda on the Silver...
Kristin Chenoweth is raring to reprise her Wicked role in the upcoming movie version of the ...
http://blog.legalfinanceamerica.com
Country: United States
Language: English
Add to Friends
Send Message
You are not logged in. Please log in to write a comment.
Blog focused on the Litigation Finance Arena. Non-Recourse plaintiff funding, Attorney loans, legal issues in the industry, and the future of alternative lending structures for the legal industry.
Original Air Date: 1/7/2008 5:00 PM UTC
News, Comments, and information on the Litigation Finance Industry/Attorney Finance Industry, and more.
Date / Time: 12/23/2007 9:34 PM UTC
LITIGATION FINANCE FIRMSThe legal financing industry evolved out of the need for underfunded plaintiffs and their attorneys to fight cases against well staffed and heavily funded defendants. Today the industry has evolved to hundreds of companies performing 24/7 plaintiff funding and attorney loans. The road to these firms present day success has been hard fought. Primarily the issue of legal funding was challenged in Ohio by a lady claiming usury and unenforceability of her contract because of third party participation. Although Rancman won in Ohio based on ancient legal principals, the rest of the U.S. courts have held up almost all other challenges. The most common challanges to this business is that;1) Plaintiff funding for a portion of a potential reward is a 'loan' and thus usury because the interest rates are compounded monthly violating most state usury laws. The current average charged is about 3% with other fees.-Only the state of Ohio has agreed to this principal and some smaller courts but most courts today agree with the industry contention that plaintiff funding is an 'investment' because if the plaintiff loses the company receives no money in return, and their is no guarantee.2)Maintanence has been contended in some cases based on an ancient ethics rule where lawyers cannot advance clients expenses during litigation.-This principal has not been excepted since the evololution of the contingency fee-whereby a civil litigator charges a fee of the outcome and is paid only if the case wins.3)Champtery or selling an interest in the outcome of a case. Most states no longer recognize this law and some have outlawed it.Some important cases on these issues are;Kraft v. MasonRancman v. Interim Settlment FundingVictoria Fausone v. U.S. Claims IncorporatedAnglo Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Smith*For a complete list visit the ABA site dedicated to all the states rulings and opinions regarding Litigation Financing-http://www.abanet.org/media/youraba/200608/article01.htmlContact:Mikey Sherriffmikey@legalfinanceamerica.com
< Previous Episodes